Oppo Reno8 T 5G vs Oppo Reno7 Lite: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 T 5G takes the lead thanks to its significantly faster 67W charging and 5G connectivity. While the Reno7 Lite boasts exceptional battery life, the Reno8 T 5G's improved charging speed and future-proofed 5G make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 T 5G | Oppo Reno7 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 01 | 2022, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 10 | Available. Released 2022, June |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| - | IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 11, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver |
| Models | CPH2505 | CPH2343 |
| Price | About 340 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 125h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.5 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 315250 (v8), 376819 (v9) GeekBench: 1996 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- Faster 67W Charging
- 5G Connectivity
- Potentially improved camera software
- Slightly more modern design
- Battery life not explicitly rated
- May have slightly less battery life than Reno7 Lite
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- Exceptional Battery Life (125h endurance rating)
- Good Display Brightness (657 nits)
- Potentially lower price
- Slower 33W Charging
- No 5G Connectivity
- Older Model
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar displays, likely AMOLED panels with Full HD+ resolution. However, the Reno7 Lite's measured 657 nits max brightness gives it a slight edge in outdoor visibility. The Reno8 T 5G may have a slightly more modern panel with improved color accuracy, but concrete data is needed for a definitive comparison. Contrast ratio is listed as 'infinite' for the Reno7 Lite, which is a nominal value and doesn't provide practical information.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a key area where differences might emerge. While both are listed as 'Photo / Video', specific sensor sizes, aperture values, and software processing algorithms will determine image quality. The Reno8 T 5G likely benefits from Oppo's latest camera software optimizations. Detailed camera samples and reviews are needed for a thorough comparison.
Performance
Both devices share the same Snapdragon 695 5G chipset and CPU configuration, meaning performance in everyday tasks and moderate gaming will be very similar. However, the Reno8 T 5G's newer manufacturing process (6nm vs potentially older for Reno7 Lite) *could* lead to slightly better efficiency and thermal management, though this is unlikely to be a major difference.
Battery Life
The Reno7 Lite shines in this category with an impressive endurance rating of 125 hours. The Reno8 T 5G, while having a similar battery capacity, doesn't have a published endurance rating. However, its 67W charging significantly reduces charging time, mitigating the impact of potentially slightly lower battery life.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 T 5G is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging, 5G connectivity, and a slightly more modern design. The Oppo Reno7 Lite is a great option for those who value long battery life above all else and are comfortable with a slightly older model.