Oppo Reno8 Pro+ vs Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity): A Deep Dive into Dimensity Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and incredibly fast charging, the Oppo Reno8 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its 80W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Dimensity 8100 Max provides more than enough power for demanding tasks, all while potentially offering better thermal management than the 12 Pro.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Pro+ | Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2022, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 01 | Available. Released 2022, July 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) | 163.6 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~521 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 109.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Mint | Gray, Blue |
| Models | PFZM10 | 2207122MC |
| Price | About 520 EUR | About 570 EUR |
Oppo Reno8 Pro+
- Significantly faster 80W charging
- Potentially better thermal management due to 5nm process
- Balanced camera system (based on brand reputation)
- Slightly less powerful CPU compared to the Xiaomi 12 Pro
- Limited information on camera sensor size
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity)
- More powerful Dimensity 9000+ chipset
- Larger display size for immersive viewing
- PD3.0 and QC4 charging compatibility
- Slower 67W charging
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Xiaomi’s image processing can be polarizing
Display Comparison
Neither device specifies display technology beyond standard OLED, but the focus here is on performance. While both likely offer excellent color accuracy, the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s larger size (6.73” vs 6.7”) may provide a more immersive viewing experience. However, without specific brightness data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. Both are expected to have 120Hz refresh rates, common for this class of device.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is challenging. Both phones likely employ capable image signal processors (ISPs) within their respective Dimensity chips. The Reno8 Pro+’s brand reputation leans towards balanced, pleasing images, while Xiaomi often aims for more vibrant, sometimes oversaturated results. The absence of sensor size information is a significant omission; larger sensors generally capture more light and detail. We can assume both will offer competent performance in good lighting conditions, but low-light capabilities will depend heavily on sensor size and image processing algorithms.
Performance
The Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) holds a clear advantage on paper with the Dimensity 9000+ (4nm) versus the Reno8 Pro+'s Dimensity 8100 Max (5nm). The 9000+ boasts a prime Cortex-X2 core clocked at 3.20 GHz, significantly higher than the Reno8 Pro+'s 2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. This translates to faster single-core performance, beneficial for responsiveness and certain applications. However, the 5nm process of the 8100 Max *could* offer better thermal efficiency, mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. The 12 Pro’s CPU configuration (1+3+4) is also more modern than the Reno8 Pro+'s (4+4), suggesting better multi-core performance as well. The Xiaomi 12 Pro is likely to excel in CPU-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The charging speed is a major differentiator. The Oppo Reno8 Pro+’s 80W wired charging is significantly faster than the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s 67W. Oppo claims 45% charge in 10 minutes and 100% in 31 minutes, while the Xiaomi 12 Pro’s charging times are comparatively slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Reno8 Pro+ effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Xiaomi 12 Pro supports PD3.0 and QC4, offering broader compatibility, but the Reno8 Pro+'s speed is a compelling advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 Pro+ if you need consistently fast charging, a well-rounded camera system, and a phone that won’t overheat during extended gaming sessions. Buy the Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) if you prioritize absolute CPU performance for tasks like video editing or demanding benchmarks, and are willing to trade some charging speed and potentially deal with slightly warmer temperatures under load.