Oppo Reno8 Pro+ vs Samsung Galaxy S22+: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Androids
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Reno8 Pro+ emerges as the stronger contender. Its significantly faster 80W charging, coupled with the efficient Dimensity 8100 Max chipset, provides a compelling package. While the S22+ boasts a brighter display and Samsung’s software ecosystem, the Reno8 Pro+ offers superior charging and comparable performance at a potentially lower price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Pro+ | Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G (5+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 71, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2022, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 01 | Available. Released 2022, February 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) | 157.4 x 75.8 x 7.6 mm (6.20 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 195 g / 196 g (mmWave) (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.3 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1750 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) - EuropeOcta-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) - ROW |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - EuropeQualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) - ROW |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Xclipse 920 - EuropeAdreno 730 - ROW |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.24", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 45W wired, PD3.0 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Mint | Phantom Black, White, Pink Gold, Green, Graphite, Sky Blue, Violet, Cream, Bora Purple |
| Models | PFZM10 | SM-S906B, SM-S906B/DS, SM-S906U, SM-S906U1, SM-S906W, SM-S906N, SM-S9060, SM-S906E, SM-S906E/DS, SM-S906L |
| Price | About 520 EUR | € 236.99 / $ 194.37 / £ 349.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.0 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 722495 (v8), 886916 (v9) GeekBench: 3528 (v5.1) GFXBench: 68fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Pro+
- Incredibly fast 80W charging
- Competitive Dimensity 8100 Max performance
- Potentially better thermal efficiency due to 5nm process
- Reverse wired charging
- Less established brand recognition
- Software support may be shorter than Samsung
Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G
- Brighter display with excellent color accuracy
- Established Samsung ecosystem and software
- Long-term software support
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging
- Slower 45W charging
- Exynos 2200 (Europe) may exhibit throttling
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S22+ boasts a peak brightness of 1214 nits, a significant advantage over what we’d expect from the Reno8 Pro+ (though Oppo doesn’t publish this spec). This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the Reno8 Pro+ likely utilizes a high-quality AMOLED panel, the S22+'s brightness and 'Infinite' contrast ratio provide a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. Both devices likely employ high refresh rate panels, but the S22+'s adaptive refresh rate technology, potentially LTPO, could contribute to better power efficiency. Bezels are expected to be comparable, with both aiming for a modern, edge-to-edge design.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are equipped with capable camera systems, but details beyond 'Photo / Video' are limited. The Reno8 Pro+ likely focuses on computational photography to enhance image quality, while the S22+ benefits from Samsung’s established camera expertise. Sensor size is a critical factor; a larger sensor generally captures more light and detail. Without specific sensor size data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The S22+'s image processing tends towards vibrant, saturated colors, while Oppo often aims for a more natural look. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on both devices is expected, crucial for stable videos and sharp low-light photos. The 2MP macro cameras often found on both devices are generally of limited utility.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno8 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5nm), featuring an octa-core configuration with Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.85 GHz. The Samsung Galaxy S22+ comes in two variants: the Exynos 2200 (4nm) in Europe and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) in other regions. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 generally offers slightly better sustained performance and thermal management than the Exynos 2200, which has been known to throttle under heavy load. However, the Dimensity 8100 Max is a very competitive chip, often trading blows with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in benchmarks and real-world usage. The 5nm process of the Dimensity 8100 Max may offer better efficiency than the 4nm Exynos 2200. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the speed and configuration could vary, impacting multitasking performance.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S22+ has an endurance rating of 97 hours, indicating solid battery life. However, the Reno8 Pro+’s 80W wired charging is a game-changer. It can achieve 45% charge in just 10 minutes and a full charge in 31 minutes, significantly reducing downtime. The S22+’s 45W charging, while supporting PD3.0, is considerably slower. The Reno8 Pro+ also offers reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories. While the S22+ includes 15W wireless charging and 4.5W reverse wireless, the Reno8 Pro+'s charging speed is the clear advantage. The difference in charging speed effectively mitigates any potential battery capacity disparity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 Pro+ if you prioritize incredibly fast charging, need a phone that can quickly top up between uses, and appreciate a powerful processor for demanding tasks. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S22+ 5G if you are deeply embedded in the Samsung ecosystem, value a consistently bright and color-accurate display, and prefer the established software experience and long-term support Samsung provides.