Oppo Reno8 Pro+ vs Realme GT2 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balance of performance, charging speed, and a polished experience, the Oppo Reno8 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 8100 Max offers excellent efficiency and sustained performance, coupled with significantly faster 80W charging. While the GT2 Pro boasts the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, its thermal management concerns and slightly slower charging hold it back.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Pro+ | Realme GT2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - China, India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2022, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 01 | Available. Released 2022, January 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) | 163.2 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 189 / 199 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | Splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm 3 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope), AF, 40x magnification |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 33 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Mint | Paper White, Paper Green, Steel Black, Titanium Blue |
| Models | PFZM10 | RMX3301, RMX3300 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | € 221.41 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 966251 (v9) GeekBench: 3501 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Pro+
- Faster 80W charging significantly reduces downtime.
- More thermally efficient Dimensity 8100 Max for sustained performance.
- Reverse wired charging adds versatility.
- Detailed camera specifications are currently unknown.
- Display specs (refresh rate, PWM dimming) are missing.
Realme GT2 Pro
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 offers peak performance for demanding tasks.
- High peak display brightness (778 nits).
- Excellent color accuracy on the display.
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is prone to thermal throttling.
- Slower 65W charging compared to the Reno8 Pro+.
Display Comparison
The Realme GT2 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 778 nits, a respectable figure, but the Reno8 Pro+’s display specifications are currently unavailable for direct comparison. However, given Oppo’s history with display technology, it’s likely to be competitive. Both displays feature an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels. Without knowing the Reno8 Pro+'s refresh rate or PWM dimming frequency, it's difficult to assess potential eye strain differences, but the GT2 Pro’s panel is generally considered excellent for color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having capable photo and video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size information or aperture details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, focusing on lens quality and image processing is crucial. Realme’s image processing tends towards vibrant, saturated colors, while Oppo often aims for a more natural look. The absence of detailed camera specs suggests neither phone is targeting the absolute top tier of mobile photography, but both should deliver good results in well-lit conditions. We can assume both will offer standard features like night mode and portrait mode.
Performance
This is where the core difference lies. The Realme GT2 Pro is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm), featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.00 GHz. This architecture prioritizes peak performance. Conversely, the Oppo Reno8 Pro+ utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Max (5nm). While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 initially appears superior, its 4nm process is known to generate more heat, potentially leading to throttling during sustained workloads. The Dimensity 8100 Max’s 5nm process offers better thermal efficiency, allowing for more consistent performance. The Reno8 Pro+'s CPU configuration (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is well-suited for multitasking and gaming, and the 5nm node will likely result in longer periods of peak performance compared to the GT2 Pro.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 117 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds are significantly different. The Oppo Reno8 Pro+ boasts 80W wired charging, achieving 45% charge in 10 minutes and 100% in 31 minutes. The Realme GT2 Pro’s 65W charging takes 33 minutes to reach 100%. This 2-minute difference may seem small, but the Reno8 Pro+'s faster charging is a tangible benefit for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The Reno8 Pro+ also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the GT2 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 Pro+ if you need consistently smooth performance across a variety of tasks, exceptionally fast charging, and a phone that stays relatively cool under load. It’s ideal for content creators, social media enthusiasts, and users who value a refined user experience. Buy the Realme GT2 Pro if you prioritize absolute peak performance for demanding gaming or benchmark scores, and are willing to accept potential thermal throttling and slightly slower charging in exchange.