OnePlus 10T vs Oppo Reno8 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day usability and a well-rounded experience, the Oppo Reno8 Pro+ emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 8100 Max offers excellent performance with better thermal management, and its 80W charging is still remarkably fast. The OnePlus 10T’s 150W charging is a headline feature, but comes at the cost of potentially more aggressive thermal throttling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Pro+ | OnePlus 10T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 38, 39, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA), Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5GHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA), Cat16 1000/150 Mbps, 5G - India |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2022, August 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 01 | Available. Released 2022, August 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) | 163 x 75.4 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 150W wired (125W for 110V sockets) |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Mint | Moonstone Black, Jade Green |
| Models | PFZM10 | CPH2415, CPH2413, CPH2417, CPH2419 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | € 377.26 / $ 289.88 / £ 330.00 / ₹ 34,198 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 96h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1016958 (v9) GeekBench: 3907 (v5.1) GFXBench: 103fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Pro+
- Faster 80W charging than many competitors.
- Potentially better thermal management due to 5nm Dimensity 8100 Max.
- Oppo’s refined software experience and camera tuning.
- Charging speed is slower than the OnePlus 10T.
- Camera details are limited, making a full assessment difficult.
OnePlus 10T
- Blazing-fast 150W charging for incredibly quick top-ups.
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset for peak performance.
- High peak brightness for excellent outdoor visibility.
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is prone to thermal throttling under sustained load.
- Software experience may be less refined than Oppo’s ColorOS.
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 10T boasts a measured peak brightness of 819 nits, providing excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the Reno8 Pro+’s peak brightness isn’t specified, Oppo typically delivers vibrant displays. Both feature an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, common in OLED panels. However, the Reno8 Pro+ likely benefits from Oppo’s color calibration expertise, potentially offering more accurate color reproduction. The absence of LTPO technology in either phone means refresh rate adjustments aren’t as dynamic as on higher-end flagships, impacting battery efficiency during variable content viewing.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. The Reno8 Pro+’s camera system is likely tuned for Oppo’s signature natural color science, while OnePlus tends towards a more vibrant, saturated look. Without specific sensor size information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Oppo often prioritizes camera quality in its 'Pro+' models. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either phone is concerning; its presence would significantly improve low-light performance and video stabilization. We can safely assume both phones include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, but the Reno8 Pro+ is more likely to have a more refined image processing pipeline.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 10T utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.19 GHz. This architecture prioritizes peak performance. Conversely, the Oppo Reno8 Pro+ employs the MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Max (5nm). While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 has a higher peak clock speed, the Dimensity 8100 Max’s 5nm process generally translates to better thermal efficiency. This means the Reno8 Pro+ is less likely to experience significant throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Snapdragon’s Adreno 730 GPU is a powerful performer, but the Dimensity 8100 Max’s Mali-G610 MC4 is no slouch, and the thermal headroom could allow it to maintain higher sustained performance. Both phones likely feature LPDDR5X RAM, ensuring fast memory access.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 96 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The OnePlus 10T’s 150W wired charging (125W for 110V sockets) is a game-changer, potentially delivering a full charge in under 20 minutes. The Oppo Reno8 Pro+’s 80W charging is still incredibly fast, reaching 100% in 31 minutes, and offers reverse wired charging. The OnePlus 10T’s faster charging is a clear advantage for users who frequently need to top up quickly, but the Reno8 Pro+’s more efficient chipset may offset the battery capacity difference in daily use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 Pro+ if you need a phone that balances performance, camera quality, and battery life without sacrificing long-term stability. It’s ideal for users who frequently multitask, enjoy mobile photography, and value a smooth, consistent experience. Buy the OnePlus 10T if you absolutely prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and are willing to accept potential trade-offs in thermal performance and potentially software refinement. It’s geared towards power users who need to top up their phone in minutes and demand peak performance in short bursts.