Oppo Reno8 Pro+ vs. Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive into Speed and Smarts
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a consistently smooth experience and exceptional camera software, the Google Pixel 7 Pro emerges as the winner. However, the Oppo Reno8 Pro+ is a compelling alternative for those who absolutely demand the fastest charging speeds and aren't as invested in the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Pro+ | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 01 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Mint | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | PFZM10 | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 520 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Pro+
- Blazing-fast 80W wired charging
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max chipset
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Less refined software experience compared to Pixel
- Camera performance likely relies more on hardware than software
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera software and AI features
- Guaranteed long-term software support from Google
- Brighter and more efficient LTPO display
- Significantly slower 23W wired charging
- Tensor G2 may not match raw CPU power of Dimensity 8100 Max in all tasks
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 7 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1090 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Reno8 Pro+. While the Reno8 Pro+’s panel specs are missing, the Pixel 7 Pro’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio ensures deep blacks and vibrant colors. Both likely utilize high refresh rate panels, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s LTPO technology dynamically adjusts the refresh rate for improved efficiency, a feature not confirmed on the Reno8 Pro+.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed as camera-centric, but their approaches diverge. The Pixel 7 Pro leverages Google’s renowned computational photography, enhancing images through software algorithms. While sensor sizes aren’t specified, the Pixel 7 Pro’s image processing excels in dynamic range and low-light performance. The Reno8 Pro+’s camera specs are less detailed, but its image processing likely focuses on delivering vibrant, social media-ready photos. The Pixel 7 Pro’s video capabilities are also likely superior, benefiting from Google’s advanced stabilization and HDR processing.
Performance
Both phones utilize 5nm chipsets, but their architectures differ significantly. The Pixel 7 Pro’s Google Tensor G2 features a prime Cortex-X1 core (2x2.85 GHz) for peak performance, alongside Cortex-A78 and A55 cores. The Reno8 Pro+ employs the Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max, utilizing four Cortex-A78 cores (4x2.85 GHz) and four A55 cores. While clock speeds are similar, the Tensor G2’s focus on AI and machine learning tasks gives it an edge in areas like voice recognition and image processing. The Reno8 Pro+ may excel in sustained CPU workloads due to its core configuration, but the Tensor G2’s integrated TPU provides a unique advantage. RAM specifications are missing for the Reno8 Pro+, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s LPDDR5X RAM ensures fast data access.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite differing capacities (unspecified for the Reno8 Pro+). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Reno8 Pro+’s 80W wired charging is significantly faster, achieving 45% charge in 10 minutes and 100% in 31 minutes. The Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W wired charging takes 30 minutes to reach 50%. The Pixel 7 Pro also offers 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features the Reno8 Pro+ also supports with reverse *wired* charging, offering more flexibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 Pro+ if you need incredibly fast 80W charging, frequently game or run demanding apps, and value a more customizable Android experience. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience, prioritize computational photography and AI features, and want guaranteed long-term software support from Google.