Oppo Reno8 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 Pro edges out the Redmi Note 12 Pro thanks to its superior chipset and faster charging. However, the Redmi Note 12 Pro offers a slightly brighter display and potentially better value depending on pricing. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 18 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 19 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glazed Green, Glazed Black, House of the Dragon | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Models | CPH2357 | 22101316C, 22101316I, 23013RK75C, 22101316G |
| Price | ₹ 28,490 | € 148.54 / $ 142.17 / £ 149.99 / ₹ 19,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 718351 (v9) GeekBench: 3395 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 490526 (v9) GeekBench: 2209 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Pro
- Superior Chipset (Dimensity 8100 Max)
- Faster 80W Charging
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Sleek Design
- Potentially higher price
- Slightly lower peak brightness than Redmi Note 12 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
- Brighter Display (890 nits)
- Competitive Price
- Reliable Battery Life
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Less Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 1080)
- Slower 67W Charging
- Potentially less refined camera processing
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with excellent color reproduction and deep blacks. The Redmi Note 12 Pro boasts a slightly higher peak brightness of 890 nits compared to the Reno8 Pro's 818 nits, making it potentially better for outdoor visibility. Both have a nominal infinite contrast ratio. The Reno8 Pro might have slightly better color accuracy out of the box.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer versatile camera systems, but the Reno8 Pro is generally considered to have a slight edge in image processing and overall quality. While both have Photo/Video capabilities, the Reno8 Pro's image processing tends to produce more natural-looking results. Low-light performance is expected to be comparable, but the Reno8 Pro's superior chipset may allow for faster processing and better noise reduction. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would be needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
The Oppo Reno8 Pro holds a clear advantage here. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max chipset is significantly more powerful than the Redmi Note 12 Pro's Dimensity 1080. This translates to smoother performance in demanding games and applications. The Reno8 Pro's 5nm process also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with endurance ratings of 100h and 97h respectively. The Oppo Reno8 Pro's 80W charging is significantly faster than the Redmi Note 12 Pro's 67W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups. Both offer reverse wired charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 Pro is ideal for users prioritizing performance and fast charging. It's a great choice for gamers and those who frequently multitask. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro is a solid option for those seeking a bright display, reliable battery life, and a more budget-friendly price point.