Oppo Reno8 Pro vs vivo V27: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo V27 edges out the Oppo Reno8 Pro thanks to its significantly longer battery life and brighter display. While the Reno8 Pro boasts a slightly faster chipset, the V27's overall package, especially its endurance, makes it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Pro | vivo V27 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 78 SA/NSA - Asia | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 18 | 2023, March 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 19 | Available. Released 2023, March 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front, glass back |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) | 164.1 x 74.8 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| - | Color changing back panel color | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 50 MP, f/2.5, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 66W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glazed Green, Glazed Black, House of the Dragon | Magic Blue, Noble Black, Emerald Green, Flowing Gold |
| Models | CPH2357 | V2231, V2246 |
| Price | ₹ 28,490 | About 380 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | Endurance rating 134h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) | -28.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 718351 (v9) GeekBench: 3395 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 613641 (v9) GeekBench: 2400 (v5.1), 2689 (v6) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Pro
- Slightly faster chipset
- 80W fast charging
- Potentially better video recording
- Lower battery life
- Less bright display
- Design may be less distinctive
vivo V27
- Exceptional battery life
- Brighter display
- Stylish design
- 66W fast charging
- Slightly less powerful chipset
- Camera performance may be slightly behind
Display Comparison
The vivo V27 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured peak brightness of 1055 nits significantly surpasses the Reno8 Pro's 818 nits, resulting in better outdoor visibility. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the V27's brightness advantage is noticeable. Both likely use AMOLED panels with vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective and depends on individual preferences. Both phones are expected to deliver good image quality in various lighting conditions. The Reno8 Pro's camera system likely offers slightly better video recording capabilities due to the more powerful chipset. Both likely feature a main sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. Detailed camera samples and comparisons would be needed for a definitive verdict.
Performance
The Oppo Reno8 Pro holds a slight advantage in performance thanks to its Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max chipset. While the vivo V27's Dimensity 7200 is still capable, the 8100 Max generally offers faster processing speeds and better graphics performance, particularly beneficial for gaming. However, real-world usage differences might be minimal for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
The vivo V27 dominates in battery life. Its endurance rating of 134 hours is significantly higher than the Reno8 Pro's 100 hours. Coupled with its 66W fast charging (50% in 19 minutes), the V27 offers exceptional longevity and quick top-ups. The Reno8 Pro's 80W charging (45% in 10 minutes, 100% in 31 minutes) is still fast, but the V27's overall battery performance is superior.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Reno8 Pro? Users prioritizing raw processing power for gaming and demanding apps might lean towards the Reno8 Pro. Who should buy the vivo V27? Those seeking exceptional battery life, a vibrant display, and a stylish design will find the V27 a better fit.