Oppo Reno8 Pro vs Reno8 T 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 Pro is the clear winner for performance and display, boasting a significantly faster chipset and brighter screen. However, the Reno8 T 5G offers excellent value with its 67W charging and more accessible price point, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Pro | Oppo Reno8 T 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 18 | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 19 | Available. Released 2023, February 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glazed Green, Glazed Black, House of the Dragon | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) |
| Models | CPH2357 | CPH2505 |
| Price | ₹ 28,490 | About 340 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 100h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 718351 (v9) GeekBench: 3395 (v5.1) GFXBench: 44fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno8 Pro
- Superior Performance
- Brighter Display
- Faster Charging (80W)
- Excellent Battery Life (100h Endurance)
- Higher Price
- Potentially Larger Size/Weight
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- More Affordable
- Good Battery Life
- Fast Charging (67W)
- Stylish Design
- Lower Performance
- Less Bright Display
- Older Chipset
Display Comparison
The Reno8 Pro takes the display crown with its measured 818 nits peak brightness, offering a significantly more vibrant and visible experience, especially outdoors. While the Reno8 T 5G's display is perfectly adequate, it lacks the same punch. Both feature OLED panels, ensuring excellent contrast and color accuracy, but the Pro's brightness is a noticeable advantage. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio on the Pro is likely a marketing term, but OLED inherently provides excellent contrast.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. However, the Reno8 Pro's chipset generally allows for better image processing and video recording capabilities. Expect slightly better dynamic range and low-light performance from the Pro. Both likely feature similar sensor sizes, but the Pro's processing advantage gives it an edge.
Performance
Here, the Reno8 Pro absolutely dominates. The Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max is a flagship-level chipset, far outpacing the Snapdragon 695 5G in the Reno8 T 5G. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and significantly better gaming performance on the Pro. The Pro's CPU configuration (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78) provides a substantial performance boost over the Reno8 T 5G's Kryo 660 cores.
Battery Life
The Reno8 Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating of 100h, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Reno8 T 5G's battery life is likely still good, but not quite as stellar. The Reno8 T 5G's 67W charging is competitive, charging to 100% in 44 minutes, while the Reno8 Pro's 80W charging is faster, reaching 100% in 31 minutes.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize performance, a vibrant display, and fast charging. It's perfect for gamers, content creators, and anyone who demands a smooth and responsive experience. The Oppo Reno8 T 5G is a great choice for those seeking a stylish 5G phone with good battery life and fast charging at a more affordable price. It's well-suited for everyday use and social media enthusiasts.