Oppo Reno8 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 Pro+ boasts a significantly faster chipset and quicker charging, making it ideal for power users. However, the Redmi Note 12 Pro excels in battery life and offers a vibrant display, presenting a compelling value proposition for those prioritizing longevity and screen quality.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Pro+ | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 01 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100-Max (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 1-45% in 10 min, 1-100% in 31 min (advertised) Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Mint | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Models | PFZM10 | 22101316C, 22101316I, 23013RK75C, 22101316G |
| Price | About 520 EUR | € 148.54 / $ 142.17 / £ 149.99 / ₹ 19,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490526 (v9) GeekBench: 2209 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Pro+
- Faster Chipset (Dimensity 8100-Max)
- 80W SuperVOOC Charging
- Generally Better Camera Quality
- Premium Build Quality
- Slightly Shorter Battery Life
- Potentially Higher Price
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
- Exceptional Battery Life (97h Endurance)
- Bright Display (890 nits)
- More Affordable
- PD3.0 Charging
- Slower Chipset (Dimensity 1080)
- Slightly Less Refined Camera
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 890 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno8 Pro+ has a good display, it doesn't reach the same brightness levels. Both offer vibrant colors and smooth refresh rates, but the Redmi's brightness gives it an edge.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Reno8 Pro+ generally produces slightly better image quality, particularly in low light. The Reno8 Pro+ often has better dynamic range and more accurate colors. However, the Redmi Note 12 Pro's camera is still very good and offers a versatile set of features.
Performance
The Oppo Reno8 Pro+’s Dimensity 8100-Max chipset is noticeably faster than the Redmi Note 12 Pro’s Dimensity 1080. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The Reno8 Pro+ handles demanding tasks with ease, while the Redmi Note 12 Pro might show slight slowdowns under heavy load.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro shines in battery life, consistently achieving impressive endurance ratings. Its 97-hour endurance rating is a testament to its power efficiency. While the Reno8 Pro+ has fast charging (80W), its battery life isn't as exceptional as the Redmi Note 12 Pro.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Reno8 Pro+? Gamers, content creators, and anyone prioritizing performance and fast charging. Who should buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro? Users seeking exceptional battery life, a bright display, and a more budget-friendly option without sacrificing key features.