Oppo Reno8 Pro+ vs Samsung Galaxy A54: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 Pro+ boasts significantly faster charging and a more powerful chipset, making it ideal for performance-focused users. However, the Galaxy A54 shines with its exceptional battery life, vibrant display, and Samsung's reliable software support, offering a more well-rounded experience for everyday use.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Pro+ | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 01 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100-Max (5 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 1-45% in 10 min, 1-100% in 31 min (advertised) Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Mint | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | PFZM10 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 520 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Pro+
- Faster Charging (80W)
- More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 8100-Max)
- Potentially Better Camera Features
- Sleek Design
- Shorter Battery Life
- Less Established Software Support
- Potentially Higher Price
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Exceptional Battery Life (119h Endurance)
- Bright and Vibrant Display (980 nits)
- Samsung's Software and Ecosystem
- Water and Dust Resistance (IP67)
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Potentially Less Advanced Camera
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 980 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno8 Pro+ has a good display, it doesn't reach the same level of brightness. The A54's infinite contrast ratio (nominal) also contributes to a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. Both phones feature AMOLED panels with smooth refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but with different strengths. The Galaxy A54 is known for its consistently good photo quality across various lighting conditions, and its video capabilities are solid. The Reno8 Pro+ likely has a more advanced camera setup with potentially better low-light performance and more specialized features, but detailed camera comparisons require in-depth testing.
Performance
The Oppo Reno8 Pro+’s Mediatek Dimensity 8100-Max chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Galaxy A54’s Exynos 1380. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Reno8 Pro+. The Dimensity 8100-Max's 5nm process also contributes to improved efficiency.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A54 is the clear winner in the battery department. Its endurance rating of 119h is exceptional, providing multiple days of use on a single charge. The Reno8 Pro+ offers incredibly fast 80W charging, but its overall battery life is likely to be shorter than the A54's.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Reno8 Pro+? Gamers, content creators, and anyone prioritizing speed and fast charging. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A54? Users seeking long battery life, a beautiful display, and a dependable, user-friendly experience with Samsung's ecosystem.