Oppo Reno8 Pro+ vs OnePlus 10 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Reno8 Pro+ emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 8100-Max offers excellent performance with superior thermal management, coupled with incredibly fast 80W charging. While the OnePlus 10 Pro boasts a brighter display and wireless charging, its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can suffer from throttling, and its North American charging speed is significantly slower.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Pro+ | OnePlus 10 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2022, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 01 | Available. Released 2022, January 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) | 163 x 73.9 x 8.6 mm (6.42 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant - T-Mobile only (not for use underwater, liquid damage is not covered under warranty) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO2 Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100-Max (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 (International), ColorOS (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 77mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 1-45% in 10 min, 1-100% in 31 min (advertised) Reverse wired | 80W wired, PD, 100% in 32 min (International) 65W wired, PD, 58% in 15 min (North America) 50W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Mint | Volcanic Black, Emerald Forest, Panda White (Extreme Edition) |
| Models | PFZM10 | NE2210, NE2211, NE2213, NE2215, NE2217 |
| Price | About 520 EUR | $ 264.39 / C$ 349.99 / £ 360.00 / € 399.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 107h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 886248 (v9) GeekBench: 3447 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Pro+
- Faster wired charging (80W vs 65/80W)
- Potentially better thermal management due to 5nm Dimensity chip
- Likely more efficient power consumption
- No wireless charging
- Camera specs are unknown, making a direct comparison difficult
OnePlus 10 Pro
- Brighter display (780 nits)
- Wireless charging support
- Hasselblad-tuned camera system
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 prone to throttling
- Slower charging speed in North America (65W)
- Potentially lower battery life due to less efficient chipset
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 10 Pro’s display leads in peak brightness, measured at 780 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. However, the Reno8 Pro+’s display specifications are not provided, so a direct comparison is limited. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. The OnePlus 10 Pro’s larger size may be preferable for media consumption, but the Reno8 Pro+ likely offers a more compact form factor. Without knowing the Reno8 Pro+'s panel technology (LTPO or not), it's difficult to assess power efficiency differences.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having strong photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. The OnePlus 10 Pro’s camera system, developed in partnership with Hasselblad, likely emphasizes color science and dynamic range. Without knowing the main sensor resolution or aperture of the Reno8 Pro+, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The presence of OIS on both devices is expected, contributing to sharper images and smoother video. We can assume both phones offer a variety of shooting modes, but the image processing style will likely differ, with OnePlus leaning towards a more saturated look and Oppo potentially favoring a more natural aesthetic.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 10 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.00 GHz, aiming for peak performance. The Reno8 Pro+ counters with the MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max (5nm), utilizing four Cortex-A78 cores at 2.85 GHz. The 5nm process of the Dimensity 8100-Max generally translates to better thermal efficiency than the 4nm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, reducing the likelihood of sustained throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 has a theoretical performance advantage, the Reno8 Pro+’s thermal management could lead to more consistent real-world performance. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5X RAM, ensuring fast memory access.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 10 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 107 hours, suggesting solid battery life. However, the Reno8 Pro+’s battery capacity is unknown. The key differentiator is charging speed. The Reno8 Pro+ supports 80W wired charging, claiming a 1-45% charge in 10 minutes and a full charge in 31 minutes. The OnePlus 10 Pro offers 80W wired charging internationally (32 minutes to 100%), but is limited to 65W in North America (58% in 15 minutes). The OnePlus 10 Pro also adds 50W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Reno8 Pro+. The Reno8 Pro+’s reverse wired charging is a useful addition for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 Pro+ if you prioritize sustained performance during gaming or demanding tasks, and value incredibly fast wired charging. It’s ideal for users who frequently use their phone throughout the day and need to top up quickly. Buy the OnePlus 10 Pro if you absolutely require wireless charging, prefer a slightly brighter display for outdoor visibility, and are willing to accept potential thermal throttling under heavy load. It caters to users deeply embedded in the OnePlus ecosystem.