Oppo Reno8 Pro+ vs. Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance, Camera, and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing charging speed and sustained performance, the Oppo Reno8 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its 80W charging and efficient Dimensity 8100-Max chipset offer a significant advantage. However, the Pixel 6 Pro remains a compelling choice for those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem and valuing its unique camera capabilities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Pro+ | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 01 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.2 x 7.3 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.29 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 183 g (6.46 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100-Max (5 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 1-45% in 10 min, 1-100% in 31 min (advertised) Reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Mint | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | PFZM10 | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 520 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Pro+
- Blazing-fast 80W charging
- Powerful and efficient Dimensity 8100-Max chipset
- Likely superior thermal management
- Potential for faster RAM (LPDDR5X)
- Camera performance may not match Pixel 6 Pro
- Software experience less refined than Pixel
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Exceptional computational photography
- Clean and intuitive Google software experience
- Strong integration with Google services
- High peak display brightness
- Significantly slower charging speeds
- Potential for thermal throttling with Tensor chip
- May lack the raw processing power of the Dimensity 8100-Max
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 846 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. While the Reno8 Pro+'s peak brightness isn't specified, its AMOLED panel likely delivers comparable vibrancy. The Pixel 6 Pro’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio, typical of OLED displays, ensures deep blacks. However, the Reno8 Pro+ may benefit from a higher PWM dimming rate, potentially reducing eye strain for sensitive users. Both devices feature curved displays, but the Reno8 Pro+’s bezel size is likely smaller, contributing to a more modern aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s Tensor chip for features like Magic Eraser and Real Tone. While the Reno8 Pro+'s camera specs aren't detailed, its image processing likely focuses on delivering vibrant, social media-ready images. The Pixel 6 Pro’s larger main sensor (spec not provided in context) and optical image stabilization (OIS) contribute to superior low-light performance and image clarity. The Reno8 Pro+ may offer more versatile zoom capabilities, but the Pixel 6 Pro’s software algorithms often compensate for hardware limitations.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 8100-Max in the Reno8 Pro+ (5nm) and Google Tensor in the Pixel 6 Pro (5nm) are both high-end chipsets, but their architectures differ significantly. The Reno8 Pro+'s CPU configuration – 4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – emphasizes sustained performance, while the Pixel 6 Pro’s 2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 prioritizes AI tasks. The Cortex-X1 in the Pixel 6 Pro offers peak performance, but the Dimensity 8100-Max’s more balanced core configuration and efficient 5nm process likely result in less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Reno8 Pro+ benefits from potentially faster LPDDR5X RAM, further enhancing its responsiveness.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for Reno8 Pro+). However, the Reno8 Pro+’s 80W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving 1-45% charge in 10 minutes and a full charge in 31 minutes (advertised). The Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W wired charging and 23W wireless charging are significantly slower, taking approximately 30 minutes to reach 50% with wired charging. The Reno8 Pro+ also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the Pixel 6 Pro’s reverse wireless charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 Pro+ if you need incredibly fast charging, a consistently powerful processor for gaming and demanding tasks, and a vibrant display. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a clean, AI-enhanced software experience, exceptional computational photography, and seamless integration with Google services, even if it means sacrificing charging speed and potentially facing some thermal limitations.