The Oppo Reno8 Pro (China) and Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive flagship space. While both aim for a premium experience, they diverge significantly in their core components, particularly their chipsets and charging speeds. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ chipset provides a substantial performance advantage over the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 in the Reno8 Pro, translating to smoother multitasking and superior gaming. While the Reno8 Pro’s 80W charging is faster, the 12 Pro’s overall package offers a more compelling flagship experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2022, July 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 11 | Available. Released 2022, July 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 161 x 74.2 x 7.6 mm (6.34 x 2.92 x 0.30 in) | 163.6 x 74.6 x 8.2 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~521 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 106.3 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 109.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.4, 15mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by Harman Kardon |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4 |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | Gray, Blue |
| Models | PGAM10 | 2207122MC |
| Price | About 420 EUR | About 570 EUR |
Oppo Reno8 Pro (China)
- Significantly faster 80W wired charging.
- Potentially more comfortable display for flicker-sensitive users (higher PWM).
- Sleek and modern design aesthetic.
- Less powerful Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 chipset.
- Likely inferior gaming performance compared to the Dimensity 9000+.
- Camera system likely less advanced than the Xiaomi 12 Pro.
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity)
- Superior performance with the Mediatek Dimensity 9000+.
- More capable gaming experience.
- Likely better camera image quality and detail.
- Slower 67W wired charging compared to the Reno8 Pro.
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained heavy load.
- Software experience can be divisive (MIUI).
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, but assuming both utilize AMOLED panels (consistent with their market positioning), the key differentiator will likely be peak brightness and color calibration. The Xiaomi 12 Pro, given its flagship status, likely boasts a higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility. While both are expected to have high refresh rates, the Reno8 Pro’s potential for a higher PWM dimming rate (based on Oppo’s display technology) could make it more comfortable for users sensitive to flicker. Bezels are likely comparable, with both aiming for a modern, immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Xiaomi 12 Pro, as a flagship, is expected to feature a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Reno8 Pro likely focuses on computational photography and AI enhancements. Lens apertures will be crucial; a wider aperture on the 12 Pro would improve low-light performance. OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is expected on both, but the implementation quality will vary. We can assume both phones will offer a versatile camera system, but the 12 Pro likely has an edge in image quality and detail, particularly in challenging conditions.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The Xiaomi 12 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4nm) significantly outpaces the Oppo Reno8 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm). The Dimensity 9000+ features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.20 GHz, compared to the Reno8 Pro’s Cortex-A710 at 2.4 GHz. This translates to a noticeable difference in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. While both chips are built on a 4nm process for efficiency, the Dimensity 9000+'s superior architecture delivers more raw power. The Reno8 Pro’s CPU configuration (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) suggests a focus on sustained performance, but it cannot match the peak performance of the 12 Pro. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5X RAM, minimizing memory-related bottlenecks.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 12 Pro supports 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4, while the Oppo Reno8 Pro boasts an impressive 80W wired charging. The Reno8 Pro can reach 45% charge in 10 minutes and 100% in 31 minutes. While the 12 Pro’s charging isn’t as rapid, it’s still very respectable. Battery capacity isn’t specified, but the faster charging of the Reno8 Pro could offset a potentially smaller battery size. The Dimensity 9000+’s efficiency might also contribute to comparable real-world battery life despite the charging difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 Pro (China) if you prioritize extremely fast charging and a potentially more refined software experience (depending on your ROM preference). It’s a good fit for users who frequently top up their phones and value a sleek design. Buy the Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) if you demand top-tier performance for gaming and demanding applications, and appreciate a more powerful processor. It’s ideal for power users and those who want a flagship experience without the absolute highest price tag.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Xiaomi 12 Pro (Dimensity) suffer from overheating during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 9000+ is known to generate heat under sustained load. While Xiaomi implements cooling solutions, extended gaming at maximum settings may lead to some thermal throttling. However, the chipset's overall performance headroom means it will likely still outperform the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 even with throttling.
❓ Is the 80W charging on the Oppo Reno8 Pro truly a game-changer in daily use?
While 80W charging is incredibly fast, the practical benefit diminishes after the initial top-ups. The convenience of quickly adding a significant charge is undeniable, but most users won't fully utilize the 31-minute 0-100% charge time regularly. It's more impactful for those who frequently forget to charge overnight.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Oppo's ColorOS and Xiaomi's MIUI?
ColorOS is generally considered to be cleaner and more refined than MIUI, with a focus on customization and user-friendliness. MIUI, while feature-rich, can be more aggressive with its app management and includes more pre-installed bloatware. Preference is subjective, but ColorOS often receives more positive reviews for its overall polish.
