Oppo Reno8 Pro (China) vs. vivo X80 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw power and camera versatility, the vivo X80 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 or Dimensity 9000 chipset delivers significantly higher performance, and its camera system offers greater flexibility. However, the Reno8 Pro presents a strong value proposition for those seeking a stylish and capable phone at a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Pro (China) | vivo X80 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2022, April 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 11 | Available. Released 2022, April 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back or ceramic back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161 x 74.2 x 7.6 mm (6.34 x 2.92 x 0.30 in) | 164.6 x 75.3 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 215 g / 219 g (7.58 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Schott Xensation Up |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 106.3 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Adreno 730Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 (Global), OriginOS Ocean (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.3", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom, gimbal OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", AF |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2 (Snapdragon)/ 5.3 (Dimensity), A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 (Global)/ 3.2 (China), OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 80W wired, 100% in 38 min 50W wireless, 100% in 50 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | Cosmic Black, Blue, Orange |
| Models | PGAM10 | V2185A, V2145 |
| Price | About 420 EUR | About 850 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 79h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.1 LUFS (Very good) |
Oppo Reno8 Pro (China)
- Faster initial charging speed (45% in 10 mins)
- Potentially lower price point
- Stylish design
- Less powerful Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 chipset
- Limited charging options (no wireless)
- Less detailed camera specifications
vivo X80 Pro
- Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 or Dimensity 9000
- Wireless charging support
- Likely superior camera performance
- Slower overall charging time (100% in 38 mins)
- Potentially higher price
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both phones offer premium display experiences, but the vivo X80 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1014 nits, suggesting a more vibrant and readable screen in direct sunlight. While both lack specific refresh rate data, flagship-level displays are expected. The Reno8 Pro’s display specs are less detailed, making a direct comparison difficult, but it’s likely to offer a similar high-quality experience. Contrast ratios are listed as infinite (nominal) for the X80 Pro, a standard for OLED panels.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed as camera-centric, but the X80 Pro likely holds an edge due to its more powerful image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 or Dimensity 9000. While both offer 'Photo/Video' capabilities, detailed sensor information is lacking for the Reno8 Pro. The X80 Pro benefits from a larger sensor and potentially more advanced image processing algorithms. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is assumed on both, crucial for sharp photos and stable videos. The Reno8 Pro’s camera system is likely optimized for social media sharing and everyday photography, while the X80 Pro aims for professional-grade results.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo X80 Pro offers a choice between the Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) and the Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4nm), both significantly more powerful than the Oppo Reno8 Pro’s Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm). The X80 Pro’s CPUs feature a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.00/3.05 GHz, compared to the Reno8 Pro’s 2.4 GHz Cortex-A710. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance on the X80 Pro. The 4nm process node on both sets of chips contributes to improved thermal efficiency, but the X80 Pro’s higher-end chipsets will still generate more heat under sustained load. The Reno8 Pro’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is still a capable performer, but it won’t match the X80 Pro in demanding scenarios.
Battery Life
The vivo X80 Pro boasts a more versatile charging system with 80W wired charging (reaching 100% in 38 minutes) and 50W wireless charging (100% in 50 minutes), while the Reno8 Pro offers only 80W wired charging (45% in 10 minutes, 100% in 31 minutes). Both support reverse wired charging. Both phones share an endurance rating of 79 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity (which isn't specified). The X80 Pro’s wireless charging capability provides added convenience, while the Reno8 Pro’s faster initial charging speed can be beneficial for quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 Pro (China) if you need a stylish, well-rounded phone with fast 80W charging and are comfortable with potentially importing a China-specific model. Buy the vivo X80 Pro if you prioritize top-tier performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and want a more versatile camera system with advanced features and potentially wireless charging.