Oppo Reno8 Pro (China) vs Samsung Galaxy A54: The Ultimate Showdown

The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two strong contenders are the Oppo Reno8 Pro (China) and the Samsung Galaxy A54. Both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one deserves your money.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Oppo Reno8 Pro (China) boasts significantly faster charging and a potentially more powerful chipset. However, the Samsung Galaxy A54 shines with its exceptional battery life, brighter display, and Samsung's reliable software support. For speed and charging, Oppo wins; for longevity and ecosystem, Samsung takes the crown.

PHONES
Phone Names	Oppo Reno8 Pro (China)	Samsung Galaxy A54

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands	1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA	1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
	CDMA2000 1xEV-DO	25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA

Launch
Announced	2022, May 23	2023, March 15
Status	Available. Released 2022, June 11	Available. Released 2023, March 24

Body
Build	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame
Dimensions	161 x 74.2 x 7.6 mm (6.34 x 2.92 x 0.30 in)	158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	188 g (6.63 oz)	202 g (7.13 oz)
	-	IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)

Display
Protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~397 ppi density)	1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density)
Size	6.62 inches, 106.3 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio)	6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak)	Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)	Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)	Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
GPU	Adreno 644	Mali-G68 MP5
OS	Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14	Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7

Memory
Card slot	No	microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM	128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
	UFS 2.2	-

Main Camera
Features	Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama	LED flash, panorama, HDR
Single	32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm	32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Triple	50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)	50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro)
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS

Selfie camera
Features	Panorama, HDR	-
Single	32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm	32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video	1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	No	No
35mm jack	No	No
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes, with stereo speakers

Comms
Bluetooth	5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD	5.3, A2DP, LE
NFC	Yes	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only)
	-	Virtual proximity sensing

Battery
Charging	80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired	25W wired
Type	Li-Po 4500 mAh	5000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Black, Blue, Gold	Lime, Graphite, Violet, White
Models	PGAM10	SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W
Price	About 420 EUR	€ 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999
SAR	-	0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	-	0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 119h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-26.6 LUFS (Good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Oppo Reno8 Pro (China)

Faster Charging (80W)
Potentially Faster Performance (Snapdragon 7 Gen 1)
Sleek Design
Reverse Wired Charging

Battery Life Not as Good as A54
Software Support May Not Be as Extensive
China Variant - Potential Software/Region Restrictions

Samsung Galaxy A54

Exceptional Battery Life (119h Endurance)
Brighter Display (980 nits)
Samsung's Software Support
Versatile Camera System

Slower Charging (25W)
Performance Slightly Behind Reno8 Pro
Exynos Chipset - Potential Efficiency Concerns

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 980 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno8 Pro has a good AMOLED display, its brightness isn't specified and likely falls short of the A54. The A54's infinite contrast ratio also contributes to a richer viewing experience.

Camera Comparison

Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the A54's camera is generally considered more versatile and consistent. Samsung's image processing is well-regarded, and the A54 likely offers better low-light performance. The Reno8 Pro's camera is good, but may lack the overall refinement of the A54.

Performance

The Oppo Reno8 Pro (China) holds an edge in performance thanks to its Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 chipset. While the Exynos 1380 in the A54 is capable, the Snapdragon generally offers better raw processing power and efficiency. This translates to smoother gaming and faster app loading times on the Reno8 Pro.

Battery Life

The Samsung Galaxy A54 dominates in battery life. Its endurance rating of 119 hours is exceptional, providing multiple days of use on a single charge. The Reno8 Pro's battery life is respectable, but falls significantly short of the A54's longevity.

Buying Guide

The Oppo Reno8 Pro (China) is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging, smooth performance for gaming, and a sleek design. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is a better choice for those who value long battery life, a vibrant display for media consumption, and the stability of Samsung's software.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Oppo Reno8 Pro (China) worth buying outside of China?

It can be, but be aware of potential software limitations and region-specific features that may not function correctly. Ensure you can flash a global ROM if necessary.

❓ Which phone has better software updates?

Samsung generally provides more consistent and longer-term software updates compared to Oppo, especially for China-specific models.