Oppo Reno8 Pro (China) vs OnePlus 10 Pro: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, efficient experience and rapid charging, the Oppo Reno8 Pro (China) offers compelling value. While the OnePlus 10 Pro boasts superior raw power, its higher price and potential for thermal throttling make it less appealing for everyday tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Pro (China) | OnePlus 10 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat18 1200/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2022, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 11 | Available. Released 2022, January 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161 x 74.2 x 7.6 mm (6.34 x 2.92 x 0.30 in) | 163 x 73.9 x 8.6 mm (6.42 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant - T-Mobile only (not for use underwater, liquid damage is not covered under warranty) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 106.3 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO2 Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 (International), ColorOS (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 77mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired | 80W wired, PD, 100% in 32 min (International) 65W wired, PD, 58% in 15 min (North America) 50W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | Volcanic Black, Emerald Forest, Panda White (Extreme Edition) |
| Models | PGAM10 | NE2210, NE2211, NE2213, NE2215, NE2217 |
| Price | About 420 EUR | $ 264.39 / C$ 349.99 / £ 360.00 / € 399.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 107h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 886248 (v9) GeekBench: 3447 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Pro (China)
- Faster charging speed (31 mins vs 32 mins)
- Potentially better thermal management due to less powerful chipset
- Likely more affordable price point
- Less powerful processor than the OnePlus 10 Pro
- Limited camera information available
- No wireless charging
OnePlus 10 Pro
- Significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Hasselblad-tuned camera system
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
- Higher price point
- Slightly slower wired charging in North America (65W)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature 4nm chipsets, but diverge significantly in display characteristics. The OnePlus 10 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 780 nits, suggesting a vibrant viewing experience, though Oppo doesn't provide a comparable figure for the Reno8 Pro. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the OnePlus 10 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio indicates a superior black level performance. The Reno8 Pro’s display details are scarce, but given its positioning, it likely prioritizes color accuracy and efficiency over outright brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having strong camera systems, but specifics are limited. The OnePlus 10 Pro benefits from Hasselblad color calibration, a feature not mentioned for the Reno8 Pro. Without sensor size details for the Reno8 Pro, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. The OnePlus 10 Pro’s camera system likely prioritizes versatility with multiple lenses and advanced image processing, while the Reno8 Pro may focus on delivering consistently good results in common shooting scenarios. The absence of detailed camera specs for the Reno8 Pro makes a definitive assessment challenging.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 10 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, with its 3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 prime core, offers significantly higher peak performance than the Reno8 Pro’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 1. The 10 Pro’s CPU configuration (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) is geared towards demanding tasks, while the Reno8 Pro (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710, 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710, 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) focuses on sustained performance and efficiency. The 4nm process node is shared, but the 8 Gen 1 is more prone to thermal throttling under prolonged load. Both utilize octa-core architectures, but the 10 Pro’s higher clock speeds and more powerful core configuration translate to a noticeable advantage in benchmarks and graphically intensive applications.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 10 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 107 hours, indicating excellent battery life. Both phones support 80W wired charging, achieving 100% charge in approximately 32 minutes (OnePlus 10 Pro - International) versus 31 minutes (Oppo Reno8 Pro). However, the OnePlus 10 Pro also offers 50W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent in the Reno8 Pro. The North American OnePlus 10 Pro is limited to 65W wired charging, taking longer to reach full capacity. While the Reno8 Pro’s charging speed is competitive, the OnePlus 10 Pro’s wireless charging capabilities provide added convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 Pro (China) if you need a stylish, fast-charging phone with excellent battery life for daily use and light to moderate gaming. It’s ideal for users who value efficiency and don’t require the absolute highest performance. Buy the OnePlus 10 Pro if you prioritize maximum performance for demanding games and applications, and are willing to accept potentially shorter battery life and a higher price point. It caters to power users and mobile gamers.