Oppo Reno8 Lite vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: Which Mid-Range 5G Phone Wins?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a slightly faster overall charging experience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the Reno8 Lite’s 33W, offsetting the identical core hardware and battery endurance rating.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Lite | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 4 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 4 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | CPH2343 | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Lite
- Potentially lighter and more compact design (spec not provided)
- Oppo's ColorOS may appeal to some users
- Reverse wired charging for accessories
- Significantly slower 33W charging
- Display brightness likely lower than Redmi
- Camera specs are unknown, hindering comparison
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Much faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3 support
- Brighter 746 nit display for outdoor visibility
- Proven 115-hour battery endurance
- Potentially heavier and bulkier design (spec not provided)
- Xiaomi's MIUI can be feature-rich but also bloated
- Camera specs are unknown, hindering comparison
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 746 nits peak brightness, crucial for comfortable outdoor use. While both phones lack high-end panel technologies like LTPO, the Redmi’s higher peak brightness provides a tangible advantage in direct sunlight. Oppo doesn’t provide brightness data, suggesting it will be less visible outdoors. Both devices feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio, a marketing term that doesn't translate to a significant real-world difference.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' camera system, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS), a direct comparison is difficult. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit. Image processing styles will likely differ, with Oppo traditionally favoring more vibrant colors and Xiaomi leaning towards a more natural look. The absence of detailed camera specs makes it impossible to declare a clear winner.
Performance
Both the Oppo Reno8 Lite and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). This means CPU performance – with its octa-core configuration of 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver – will be virtually identical in day-to-day tasks. The 6nm process node offers a good balance of power efficiency, but neither phone is positioned as a gaming powerhouse. RAM configurations are not specified, but performance will be largely dictated by the chipset, not RAM speed. Thermal management will likely be similar, with both devices potentially throttling under sustained heavy loads.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 115 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds are dramatically different. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 67W charging can reach 50% in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes, while the Reno8 Lite’s 33W charging takes 15 minutes to reach 31% and 63 minutes for a complete charge. This difference in charging speed is a significant advantage for the Redmi, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The Redmi also supports PD3.0 and QC3, offering wider compatibility with fast chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 Lite if you prioritize a lighter, potentially more streamlined software experience and are less concerned with the absolute fastest charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you value quicker top-ups, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a proven track record of robust battery endurance, even if it means a slightly heavier device.