Oppo Reno8 Lite vs Xiaomi 12 Lite: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders

The Oppo Reno8 Lite and Xiaomi 12 Lite represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, but they achieve this through different approaches. The Reno8 Lite focuses on a balance of features and affordability, while the 12 Lite leans towards a more refined design and a more powerful chipset. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Xiaomi 12 Lite emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Reno8 Lite’s Snapdragon 695, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While both offer similar battery endurance, the 12 Lite’s significantly faster 67W charging is a major convenience factor.

PHONES
Phone Names	Oppo Reno8 Lite	Xiaomi 12 Lite

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66
5G bands	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G

Launch
Announced	2022, June 4	2022, July 09
Status	Available. Released 2022, June 4	Available. Released 2022, July 11

Body
Build	Glass front, plastic frame, glass back	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame
Dimensions	159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in)	159.3 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.27 x 2.90 x 0.29 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	173 g (6.10 oz)	173 g (6.10 oz)
	IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress)	-

Display
Protection	-	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)
Size	6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio)	6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM)	AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 950 nits (peak)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)	Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)	Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)
GPU	Adreno 619	Adreno 642L
OS	Android 11, ColorOS 12	Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS

Memory
Card slot	microSDXC	No
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM	128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2

Main Camera
Features	LED flash, HDR, panorama	Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Single	16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm	32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF
Triple	64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens	108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video	1080p@30fps	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS

Selfie camera
Features	HDR, panorama	HDR, panorama
Single	16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm	32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	No
35mm jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes, with dual speakers
	-	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD	5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive
Infrared port	-	Yes
NFC	Yes	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS	GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1)
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
	-	Virtual proximity sensing

Battery
Charging	33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired	67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 50% in 13 min
Type	Li-Po 4500 mAh	Li-Po 4300 mAh

Misc
Colors	Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver	Black, Lite Green, Lite Pink
Models	CPH2343	2203129G
Price	About 250 EUR	€ 119.80 / $ 269.00 / £ 121.15
SAR	-	1.09 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	-	0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 100h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-25.2 LUFS (Very good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 528905 (v9) GeekBench: 2943 (v5.1) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Oppo Reno8 Lite

More affordable price point
Reverse wired charging capability
Slightly lighter weight (likely)

Significantly weaker processor
Slower charging speeds
Potentially lower camera quality

Xiaomi 12 Lite

More powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset
Much faster 67W charging
Brighter display for better outdoor visibility

Higher price tag
No reverse wireless charging
Slightly heavier build (likely)

Display Comparison

The Xiaomi 12 Lite boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 824 nits, which will provide better visibility outdoors compared to the Reno8 Lite (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the 12 Lite’s higher peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio suggest a more immersive viewing experience. Bezels are likely comparable, given the similar overall design philosophies, but the 12 Lite’s slightly smaller form factor might result in a marginally higher screen-to-body ratio. Color accuracy data is unavailable for either device, but Xiaomi typically calibrates its displays for reasonably accurate color reproduction.

Camera Comparison

Both phones are marketed with a focus on photography, but the Xiaomi 12 Lite likely holds an advantage. While both offer 'Photo/Video' capabilities (lacking specific details), the 12 Lite’s chipset has a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) for faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. Sensor sizes are unknown, but the 12 Lite’s overall processing power suggests it will produce more detailed and dynamic images. The Reno8 Lite’s camera system is likely geared towards social media sharing, while the 12 Lite aims for a more versatile photographic experience. We can safely ignore the presence of typical 2MP macro lenses on both devices, as their image quality is generally poor.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 12 Lite’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a significant step up from the Oppo Reno8 Lite’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The 778G features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores – compared to the Reno8 Lite’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver. This translates to approximately 30-40% faster CPU performance in benchmarks. The 778G’s Adreno 642L GPU also offers a substantial graphics boost, making the 12 Lite the clear winner for gaming. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, but the 12 Lite’s superior SoC will still deliver a smoother experience.

Battery Life

Both devices boast an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Xiaomi 12 Lite’s 67W wired charging (PD3.0, QC4) can reach 50% charge in just 13 minutes, a significant advantage over the Reno8 Lite’s 33W charging, which takes 31% in 15 minutes and 100% in 63 minutes. This faster charging is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery. While the Reno8 Lite offers reverse wired charging, the 12 Lite’s faster charging speed makes it the more practical choice for most users.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo Reno8 Lite if you prioritize a lower price point and are a casual smartphone user who primarily focuses on social media, messaging, and light web browsing. Buy the Xiaomi 12 Lite if you value performance for gaming and demanding apps, appreciate faster charging speeds, and are willing to spend a bit more for a more polished overall experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo Reno8 Lite struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?

Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is a mid-range chipset and will likely struggle to deliver a smooth experience in demanding games like Genshin Impact, even at lower settings. Expect noticeable frame drops and potential stuttering. The Xiaomi 12 Lite’s Snapdragon 778G is far better equipped to handle such titles.

❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Xiaomi 12 Lite compared to the 33W charging on the Oppo Reno8 Lite in a typical use case?

In a typical use case, the 67W charging on the Xiaomi 12 Lite will save you approximately 30-40 minutes to fully charge the phone compared to the Oppo Reno8 Lite. The 12 Lite can reach 50% charge in just 13 minutes, while the Reno8 Lite takes significantly longer.

❓ Are the camera differences between these phones noticeable for casual social media users?

For casual social media users who primarily take photos in good lighting conditions, the differences in camera quality might be subtle. However, the Xiaomi 12 Lite’s superior image processing will be more noticeable in low-light scenarios and when capturing fast-moving subjects.

❓ Does either phone overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?

The Snapdragon 778G in the Xiaomi 12 Lite is generally more thermally efficient than the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo Reno8 Lite. While both phones may experience some warming during extended gaming, the 12 Lite is less likely to experience significant throttling and performance drops.