Oppo Reno8 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a brighter display, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Exynos 1280 chipset, despite potential thermal concerns, offers a noticeable performance edge, and the 830 nit display provides superior visibility. However, the Reno8 Lite’s faster charging is a significant advantage for those on the go.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Lite | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 4 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 4 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | CPH2343 | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | About 250 EUR | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Lite
- Faster 33W charging with PD
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially more efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Likely more affordable price point
- Less powerful CPU and GPU compared to Exynos 1280
- Likely lower display brightness and quality
- Potentially less refined camera image processing
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- More powerful Exynos 1280 chipset
- Brighter 830 nit display with Super AMOLED technology
- Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for improved camera performance
- Samsung’s established software ecosystem
- Slower 25W charging
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
- Generally higher price point
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a significant advantage in display quality with a measured peak brightness of 830 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno8 Lite’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s likely to fall short of this figure. The A53’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a Super AMOLED panel, offering deeper blacks and more vibrant colors compared to the Reno8 Lite’s likely LCD panel. This difference is crucial for media consumption and gaming, making the A53 a more immersive experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed with capable camera systems, but specifics are limited. The A53 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing expertise, potentially delivering more refined photos and videos. Without detailed sensor size information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the A53’s inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is a significant advantage, resulting in sharper images and smoother videos, especially in low-light conditions. The Reno8 Lite’s camera performance will likely be adequate for casual photography, but it’s unlikely to match the A53’s capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo Reno8 Lite utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is powered by the Exynos 1280 (5nm). The Exynos 1280, built on a smaller 5nm process, generally offers superior performance and efficiency. Its octa-core configuration with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores provides a more powerful CPU than the Reno8 Lite’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. While the Snapdragon 695 is a capable chip for everyday tasks, the Exynos 1280 will handle demanding games and multitasking with greater ease. However, the Exynos 1280 is known to run warmer, potentially leading to thermal throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified). However, the Reno8 Lite’s 33W wired charging with PD support offers a substantial advantage. It can achieve a 31% charge in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 63 minutes. The A53 5G’s 25W charging is slower, requiring more time to reach 100%. The Reno8 Lite also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the A53, allowing it to top up other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 Lite if you need a phone that charges incredibly quickly and you primarily use it for everyday tasks like social media, messaging, and light browsing. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prefer a brighter, more vibrant display, demand more processing power for gaming or multitasking, and value Samsung’s established software ecosystem and potentially longer software support.