Oppo Reno8 Lite vs Oppo Reno8: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging, more powerful chipset, and brighter display. While the Reno8 Lite offers a more budget-friendly option, the Reno8's superior performance and features justify its higher price for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Lite | Oppo Reno8 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 4 | 2022, July 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 4 | Available. Released 2022, July 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 28 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver | Shimmer Gold, Shimmer Black |
| Models | CPH2343 | CPH2359 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | £ 279.99 / € 158.14 / ₹ 24,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 105h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.7 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 619610a (v9) GeekBench: 2694 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 Lite
- More affordable
- Stylish design
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reverse wired charging
- Slower charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Dimmer display
- Potentially lower camera quality
Oppo Reno8
- Faster charging (80W)
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 1300)
- Brighter and better display
- Potentially better camera quality
- Excellent battery life (105h endurance)
- More expensive
- Design may be less distinctive
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno8 boasts a measured peak brightness of 633 nits, offering a significantly better viewing experience, especially outdoors. Its contrast ratio is listed as 'Infinite' (nominal), suggesting excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The Reno8 Lite's display is likely adequate but lacks the same level of brightness and contrast. We'd expect the Reno8 to be noticeably sharper and more visually appealing.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature dedicated camera systems, but the Reno8 likely has an edge in image quality due to its more powerful processor and potentially better sensors. While specific camera specs are not detailed, the Dimensity 1300 generally allows for better image processing and low-light performance. Expect the Reno8 to capture more detail and produce more vibrant colors.
Performance
The Reno8's Mediatek Dimensity 1300 chipset is a clear winner here. Its octa-core CPU, featuring Cortex-A78 cores, provides significantly more processing power than the Reno8 Lite's Snapdragon 695. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The Reno8 Lite is still capable for everyday use, but the Reno8 offers a more premium experience.
Battery Life
The Reno8's endurance rating of 105h is impressive, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the real difference lies in charging speed. The Reno8's 80W charging is incredibly fast, reaching 50% in just 11 minutes and 100% in 28 minutes. The Reno8 Lite's 33W charging is considerably slower, taking 63 minutes to fully charge.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 Lite is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a stylish design and decent performance for everyday tasks. The Oppo Reno8 is the better choice for those seeking a faster processor, quicker charging, and a brighter, more vibrant display, especially if photography and gaming are important.