Oppo Reno8 Lite vs Oppo A98: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A98 takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster 67W charging, offering a much quicker top-up. While both phones share the same Snapdragon 695 chipset, the A98's charging advantage makes it the better value for most users who prioritize speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Lite | Oppo A98 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 4 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 4 | Available. Released 2023, May 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 165.6 x 76.1 x 8.2 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope) Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD, 50% in 18 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver | Cool Black, Dreamy Blue |
| Models | CPH2343 | CPH2529 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 290 EUR |
Oppo Reno8 Lite
- Potentially better display quality
- Likely slightly better camera performance
- More refined design
- Slower charging speed
- May lack some features of the A98
Oppo A98
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- Good value for money
- Solid overall performance
- Potentially less refined design
- Camera might be slightly inferior to Reno8 Lite
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar 6.4-inch or 6.5-inch FHD+ displays, potentially with a 90Hz refresh rate. The Reno8 Lite might have a slightly more polished display panel with better color accuracy, but this is speculative without specific panel details. Expect similar viewing experiences overall.
Camera Comparison
The Reno8 Lite is likely to have a more refined camera system, potentially with a higher resolution primary sensor and improved image processing algorithms. The A98 might offer a slightly different camera setup, but overall, the Reno8 Lite is expected to deliver slightly better image quality, especially in low light. Expect both to offer decent camera performance for the price.
Performance
Performance is expected to be nearly identical, as both devices utilize the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset. Day-to-day tasks, social media, and light gaming should run smoothly on both. Demanding games might require lower graphics settings.
Battery Life
The A98's 67W charging is a massive advantage. It can charge from 0 to 50% in just 18 minutes, while the Reno8 Lite's 33W charging takes considerably longer. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 4500-5000mAh), so the A98 will offer significantly faster charging times.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 Lite is ideal for users who prioritize a slightly more refined design and don't heavily rely on fast charging. The Oppo A98 is the better choice for those who need rapid charging and appreciate a more utilitarian design, offering a faster charging experience for the same price.