Google Pixel 6a vs Oppo Reno8 Lite: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 6a is the superior choice. Its Google Tensor chip delivers significantly better performance and future-proofing, coupled with exceptional camera capabilities. While the Reno8 Lite offers faster charging, the Pixel 6a’s overall experience justifies the slightly higher price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 Lite | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 4 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 4 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | CPH2343 | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 250 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Oppo Reno8 Lite
- Superior performance with Google Tensor chip
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing
- Guaranteed software updates from Google
- Slower charging speeds (18W)
- Potentially higher price point
Google Pixel 6a
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Sleek and lightweight design
- More affordable price
- Significantly weaker performance compared to Tensor
- Inferior camera quality
- Less certain long-term software support
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a boasts a notably brighter display, reaching 876 nits measured, compared to the Reno8 Lite’s unspecified peak brightness. This translates to better visibility outdoors. While both likely utilize OLED panels (based on the 'infinite' contrast ratio of the Pixel 6a), the Pixel’s superior brightness and Google’s color calibration offer a more vibrant and accurate viewing experience. Bezels are comparable, but the Pixel 6a’s flat display may be preferred by some over the Reno8 Lite’s potentially curved edges.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a excels in camera performance thanks to Google’s computational photography prowess. While sensor sizes aren’t specified, the Pixel’s image processing algorithms consistently deliver exceptional dynamic range and detail. The Reno8 Lite’s camera system, while likely decent in good lighting, won’t match the Pixel’s low-light capabilities or overall image quality. Ignoring the Reno8 Lite’s likely 2MP macro lens, the Pixel 6a’s focus on a strong primary sensor and software optimization provides a more versatile and reliable camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno8 Lite’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Tensor’s octa-core configuration, featuring 2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 cores, provides a substantial performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks and AI processing. The Snapdragon 695, while capable for everyday use, will struggle with demanding games and multitasking. The Pixel 6a’s likely use of faster LPDDR5 RAM further enhances its responsiveness. Thermal management is a question mark for both, but the 5nm Tensor generally offers better efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 94 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Reno8 Lite). However, charging speeds differ dramatically. The Reno8 Lite’s 33W wired charging can reach 31% in 15 minutes and 100% in 63 minutes, while the Pixel 6a’s 18W charging is considerably slower. This makes the Reno8 Lite a better choice for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly, despite the similar overall endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 Lite if you prioritize a lightweight design and rapid 33W charging, and your primary use case revolves around social media and light tasks. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you value a smoother, more responsive user experience, superior camera quality, and guaranteed software updates directly from Google, even if it means slower charging speeds.