Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro vs Oppo Reno8 (China): Which Dimensity Powerhouse Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 9000 chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the Reno8’s Dimensity 1300, making it better suited for demanding tasks and gaming. However, the Reno8’s 80W charging is a respectable alternative if ultimate speed isn't a priority.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 (China) | Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 01 | Available. Released 2022, March 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 163.1 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | OLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 20 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 20 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 28 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold, Violet | Black, Gray, Blue, Green |
| Models | PGBM10 | 22021211RC, 22011211C |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 410 EUR |
Oppo Reno8 (China)
- 80W SuperVOOC charging is very fast.
- Potentially more refined ColorOS software experience.
- Likely a more compact and ergonomic design.
- Dimensity 1300 chipset is outperformed by the K50 Pro’s Dimensity 9000.
- Camera system likely less capable than the K50 Pro.
Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro
- Dimensity 9000 offers flagship-level performance.
- 120W HyperCharge is incredibly fast.
- Likely superior camera system with a larger sensor.
- MIUI software can be bloated and less polished than ColorOS.
- May be larger and heavier than the Reno8.
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the K50 Pro's positioning as a performance-focused device, it likely features a higher refresh rate panel (potentially 120Hz vs 90Hz on the Reno8) and potentially higher peak brightness. Both are expected to utilize AMOLED technology, but the K50 Pro may benefit from a more advanced panel generation, offering improved color accuracy and viewing angles. Bezels are likely comparable, given both brands' focus on maximizing screen real estate.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. However, the K50 Pro, being the higher-tier device, likely features a larger main sensor with a wider aperture, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is also more probable on the K50 Pro. While both phones likely include ultrawide and macro lenses, the Reno8’s image processing may lean towards more saturated colors, a common Oppo trait, while Xiaomi typically aims for a more natural look. The K50 Pro’s superior ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Dimensity 9000 will also contribute to faster image processing and improved noise reduction.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro’s Dimensity 9000, fabricated on a 4nm process, represents a substantial leap over the Oppo Reno8’s Dimensity 1300 (6nm). The 9000 boasts a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.05GHz, compared to the Reno8’s Cortex-A78. This architectural difference translates to significantly faster single-core performance. The K50 Pro’s GPU is also superior, offering a more fluid gaming experience, especially at higher settings. While both phones likely feature LPDDR5 RAM, the K50 Pro’s chipset is better equipped to leverage its bandwidth. The 4nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Redmi K50 Pro’s 120W charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Oppo Reno8’s 80W charging, which takes 28 minutes to reach 100%. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the K50 Pro’s more efficient chipset and potentially optimized software could offset any capacity difference. The K50 Pro also supports PD3.0 and QC3 charging standards, offering broader compatibility with chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 (China) if you prioritize a well-rounded experience with very fast charging and a potentially more refined software experience (depending on ColorOS preference). Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro if you demand maximum performance for gaming and multitasking, and are willing to trade a slightly less polished software experience for the superior chipset.