Oppo Reno8 (China) vs Xiaomi 11T: A Clash of Mid-Range Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 (China) takes the lead with its significantly faster 80W charging and potentially better camera features. However, the Xiaomi 11T boasts exceptional battery life and a bright display. Ultimately, the Reno8 prioritizes speed, while the 11T focuses on endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 (China) | Xiaomi 11T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2021, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 01 | Available. Released 2021, October 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 164.1 x 76.9 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 28 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, 100% in 36 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold, Violet | Meteorite Gray, Moonlight White, Celestial Blue |
| Models | PGBM10 | 21081111RG |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 119.00 / £ 275.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.83 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 0.95 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 98h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 590837 (v9) GeekBench: 2834 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 (China)
- 80W Super Fast Charging
- Potentially Superior Camera
- Sleek Design
- Slightly Better Performance (Dimensity 1300)
- Battery Capacity Unknown
- Limited Availability (China Model)
- Specific Display Brightness Data Missing
Xiaomi 11T
- Exceptional Battery Life (98h Endurance)
- Bright Display (798 nits)
- Competitive Price
- Good Overall Performance
- Slower Charging (67W)
- Camera May Not Be as Refined
- Nominal Contrast Ratio Value
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Xiaomi 11T boasts a measured peak brightness of 798 nits, making it slightly better for outdoor visibility. The contrast ratio is listed as 'infinite' for the 11T, which is a nominal value and doesn't provide concrete data. The Reno8 likely has a good display, but specific brightness figures are unavailable.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited for both phones in the provided data. However, the Reno8 is generally known for its strong camera capabilities, often featuring advanced image processing. The Xiaomi 11T is a capable camera phone, but may not match the Reno8's overall image quality. Further research on specific camera features (e.g., stabilization, night mode) is recommended.
Performance
Both devices are powered by Mediatek Dimensity chips – the Reno8 with the Dimensity 1300 and the 11T with the Dimensity 1200. While both have the same CPU core configuration, the Dimensity 1300 generally offers a slight performance edge. Expect smooth multitasking and gaming on both, but the Reno8 might handle more demanding tasks a bit better.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 11T shines in this category with an impressive endurance rating of 98 hours. The Oppo Reno8's battery capacity is unknown, but its 80W charging is a significant advantage, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. While the 11T lasts longer, the Reno8 can quickly recover from low battery.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 (China) is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging, stylish design, and potentially a more refined camera experience. The Xiaomi 11T is a great choice for those who value long battery life, a bright display for media consumption, and a more budget-friendly price point.