Oppo Reno8 (China) vs Realme GT2 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a brighter display, the Realme GT2 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. While the Oppo Reno8 boasts impressively fast 80W charging, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in the GT2 Pro offers a noticeable performance edge, despite similar battery endurance ratings.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno8 (China) | Realme GT2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - China, India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2022, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 01 | Available. Released 2022, January 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 163.2 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 189 / 199 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | Splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | LTPO2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 150˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm 3 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope), AF, 40x magnification |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 28 min Reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 33 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold, Violet | Paper White, Paper Green, Steel Black, Titanium Blue |
| Models | PGBM10 | RMX3301, RMX3300 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 221.41 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 966251 (v9) GeekBench: 3501 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 (China)
- Significantly faster 80W charging
- Potentially more efficient Dimensity 1300 chipset
- Streamlined user experience (typical of Oppo)
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Display likely lacks the brightness of the GT2 Pro
- Limited information on camera sensor specifications
Realme GT2 Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor
- Brighter display with 778 nits peak brightness
- Potentially superior image processing capabilities
- Slower 65W charging compared to the Reno8
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can be prone to thermal throttling
- Higher price point (likely)
Display Comparison
The Realme GT2 Pro features a display capable of reaching 778 nits of peak brightness, providing excellent visibility in outdoor conditions. While the Reno8’s display specs are not provided, the GT2 Pro’s high brightness and infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggest a superior viewing experience. The lack of LTPO technology in either phone means refresh rate scaling isn't as efficient as on some competitors, but the GT2 Pro’s brightness advantage is a significant differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Realme GT2 Pro, being a flagship, likely incorporates a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, potentially leading to superior image processing and low-light performance. The Reno8’s camera system is likely optimized for everyday use, while the GT2 Pro aims for a more versatile and high-quality photographic experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme GT2 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm) utilizes a Cortex-X2 prime core for peak performance, alongside Cortex-A710 and A510 cores. This contrasts with the Oppo Reno8’s Dimensity 1300 (6nm), which employs Cortex-A78 cores. The 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 generally translates to better thermal efficiency compared to the 6nm Dimensity 1300, potentially mitigating throttling during extended, intensive tasks. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s architecture is geared towards higher peak performance, making it the better choice for demanding gamers and power users.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 117 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds diverge significantly. The Oppo Reno8’s 80W wired charging can reach 45% in 10 minutes and 100% in 28 minutes, while the Realme GT2 Pro’s 65W charging takes 33 minutes for a full charge. The Reno8’s faster charging is a clear advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups, even if overall battery endurance is similar.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 (China) if you need exceptionally fast charging and value a streamlined user experience with a focus on efficiency. Buy the Realme GT2 Pro if you prioritize maximum processing power for demanding games and applications, and appreciate a brighter, more vibrant display for multimedia consumption.