Oppo's Reno series consistently delivers stylish phones with a focus on camera capabilities and fast charging. The Reno8 and Reno9 are the latest iterations, but which one offers the best overall experience? This comprehensive comparison will break down the key differences to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno9 edges out the Reno8 thanks to the Snapdragon 778G's efficiency and slightly improved overall performance. While the Reno8 boasts faster charging, the Reno9's refined design and smoother experience make it the better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2022, November 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 01 | Available. Released 2022, December 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 162.3 x 74.2 x 7.2 mm (6.39 x 2.92 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 174 g (6.14 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 - 512GB
UFS 2.2 - 256GB |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 28 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD, QC2, 33% in 10 min, 100% in 44 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold, Violet | Black, Gold, Pink gradient, Red |
| Models | PGBM10 | PHM110 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 600 EUR |
Oppo Reno8 (China)
- Extremely fast 80W charging
- Potentially slightly higher peak CPU performance
- Stylish design
- Sustained performance may be limited by thermal throttling
- Camera might not be as optimized as Reno9
- Software experience could be less refined
Oppo Reno9
- Efficient Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Smoother overall performance
- Refined design and build quality
- Likely improved camera processing
- Slower charging speed (67W)
- Peak CPU performance slightly lower than Reno8
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar OLED displays with a 90Hz or 120Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The Reno9 might have a slightly improved display calibration or brightness, but differences will be subtle. Expect similar resolution (likely FHD+).
Camera Comparison
Both phones are expected to have capable camera systems. The Reno9 likely features improvements in image processing and low-light performance due to software optimizations and potentially a slightly upgraded sensor. Expect similar main sensor resolution (likely 50MP), but the Reno9 might have a better ultrawide lens. Video recording capabilities should be comparable.
Performance
The Snapdragon 778G in the Reno9 generally offers better sustained performance and efficiency compared to the Dimensity 1300 in the Reno8. While the Dimensity 1300 has a higher peak CPU clock speed, the 778G's architecture and optimization often result in a smoother, less thermally-throttled experience, especially during prolonged gaming or multitasking. The Reno8 might show a slight edge in raw benchmark scores, but real-world usage favors the Reno9.
Battery Life
The Reno8 takes a clear lead in charging speed with its 80W wired charging, reaching 100% in 28 minutes. The Reno9's 67W charging is still fast, but takes around 44 minutes for a full charge. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 4500mAh), so the Reno8's faster charging gives it an advantage for those who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno8 (China) is a good choice for users prioritizing extremely fast charging and a slightly more powerful chipset for demanding tasks. The Oppo Reno9 is ideal for those seeking a balanced experience with a refined design, efficient performance, and a generally smoother user interface.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno9 worth the upgrade from the Reno8?
If you prioritize smoother performance, a refined design, and potentially better camera processing, then the Reno9 is a worthwhile upgrade. However, if extremely fast charging is your top priority, the Reno8 remains a compelling option.
❓ Which chipset is better, Dimensity 1300 or Snapdragon 778G?
While the Dimensity 1300 has a higher peak clock speed, the Snapdragon 778G generally offers better sustained performance and efficiency due to its architecture and optimization.
