The Oppo Reno8 (China) and Honor Magic4 Lite represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they diverge significantly in their core components, particularly in chipset choice and charging technology. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Oppo Reno8 (China) is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1300 chipset offers a substantial performance uplift over the Snapdragon 695 in the Magic4 Lite. However, the Honor Magic4 Lite provides a solid, efficient experience with comparable battery endurance and a respectable display.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2022, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 01 | Available. Released 2022, April 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) | 166 x 75.8 x 8 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5 |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 28 min
Reverse wired | 66W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold, Violet | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black |
| Models | PGBM10 | ANY-LX1, ANY-LX2, ANY-LX3 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 180 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1229:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-34.0 LUFS (Poor)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 387218 (v9)
GeekBench: 1906 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 (China)
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 1300)
- Ultra-fast 80W charging
- Potential for superior display quality (likely AMOLED)
- Battery capacity not specified, potentially smaller than Magic4 Lite
- Thermal throttling potential due to higher performance chipset
Honor Magic4 Lite
- Excellent battery endurance (104h rating)
- Respectable 66W charging
- Efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Lower CPU and GPU performance
- LCD display with lower peak brightness
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo Reno8 and Honor Magic4 Lite share a contrast ratio of 1229:1, suggesting similar color reproduction capabilities. However, the Honor Magic4 Lite’s measured peak brightness of 535 nits is a key differentiator. While adequate for indoor use, it may struggle in direct sunlight compared to displays commonly found in this price bracket. Oppo doesn't provide brightness data, but typically prioritizes vibrant colors. The Reno8’s display technology is not specified, but given Oppo’s recent trends, it likely utilizes an AMOLED panel, offering superior contrast and color accuracy compared to the Magic4 Lite’s LCD.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific sensor details. This makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the Reno series historically emphasizes camera performance, suggesting Oppo may have invested in a higher-resolution or larger sensor for the Reno8. The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for either device suggests reliance on software stabilization. The 2MP macro cameras often found in this segment are unlikely to deliver significant image quality improvements on either phone, serving primarily as a marketing feature.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno8 (China) boasts the Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6nm), featuring a powerful octa-core configuration with a prime Cortex-A78 core clocked at 3.0 GHz. This architecture is designed for sustained performance, crucial for gaming and multitasking. Conversely, the Honor Magic4 Lite utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), with a more modest CPU configuration peaking at 2.2 GHz. While the Snapdragon 695 is efficient, the Dimensity 1300 offers a significant advantage in CPU and GPU performance, translating to faster app loading times and smoother graphics rendering. The Reno8’s potential for higher sustained performance, however, may be limited by thermal management, a factor not detailed in the provided specs.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic4 Lite claims an impressive endurance rating of 104 hours, indicating excellent battery life under typical usage. While the Oppo Reno8’s battery capacity is not specified, its 80W wired charging capability is a major advantage. This allows for a 45% charge in just 10 minutes and a full charge in 28 minutes. The Magic4 Lite’s 66W charging is also fast, but noticeably slower. The Reno8’s faster charging mitigates the potential impact of a smaller battery capacity, offering greater convenience for users who frequently need to top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 (China) if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications, enjoy fast-paced gaming, and value the convenience of 80W SuperVOOC charging. Buy the Honor Magic4 Lite if you prioritize all-day battery life, a consistently smooth experience for everyday tasks, and a more conservative approach to power consumption, potentially benefiting from less thermal throttling during prolonged use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 1300 in the Oppo Reno8 (China) prone to overheating during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 1300 is a powerful chipset, its thermal performance depends heavily on Oppo's cooling solution, which isn't detailed in the specifications. It's likely to generate more heat than the Snapdragon 695, potentially leading to throttling during prolonged, demanding games. However, the 6nm process node helps mitigate this risk.
❓ Does the Honor Magic4 Lite support any form of fast charging protocols beyond 66W, such as Power Delivery?
The specifications only mention 66W wired charging. Honor typically supports its own SuperCharge protocol, but compatibility with Power Delivery (PD) or Quick Charge (QC) is not confirmed. Users should verify compatibility with their existing chargers.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 695 in the Honor Magic4 Lite perform with popular 5G applications like video streaming and social media?
The Snapdragon 695 is well-suited for everyday tasks like video streaming, social media browsing, and web browsing. Its 5G modem provides reliable connectivity, and the chipset is efficient enough to deliver a smooth experience without significant battery drain. However, it won't offer the same level of responsiveness as the Dimensity 1300 when multitasking or running demanding apps.
