The Oppo Reno8 4G and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim for affordability, they take different approaches: the Reno8 prioritizes a sleek design and efficient processor, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G focuses on 5G connectivity and rapid charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift and future-proofs connectivity, while the significantly faster 67W charging mitigates the similar battery endurance ratings. The Reno8 4G remains a viable option for those prioritizing a streamlined experience and don't require 5G.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 17 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 26 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.7 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | IPX4 water resistant
RGB ring light around the camera (notifications, charging progress) | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dawnlight Gold, Starlight Black | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | CPH2457 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 330 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 4G
- Sleek and lightweight design
- Efficient Snapdragon 680 processor for everyday tasks
- 5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Significantly slower 33W charging
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 695 5G processor
- Future-proof 5G connectivity
- Ultra-fast 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3
- Potentially bulkier design
- More customized software experience (MIUI)
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the market positioning, we can assume both offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s larger display size (typically 6.67 inches vs Reno8’s 6.43 inches) will appeal to media consumers, though this comes at the cost of one-handed usability. Without specific data, it's difficult to assess color accuracy or HDR support.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. We can infer that both will offer a standard array of camera modes. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market trend suggests the Poco X4 Pro 5G likely features a higher resolution main sensor. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS). Image processing algorithms will likely differentiate the final image quality, but without sample images, it’s impossible to determine which phone excels in this area.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture and integrated 5G modem compared to the Reno8 4G’s Snapdragon 680 (6nm). The 695 features 2x Kryo 660 Gold cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6x Kryo 660 Silver cores at 1.7 GHz, while the 680 has 4x Kryo 265 Gold cores at 2.4 GHz and 4x Kryo 265 Silver cores at 1.9 GHz. While the Reno8’s cores are clocked higher, the 695’s newer architecture and additional cores provide a performance advantage in multi-threaded tasks and gaming. This translates to smoother multitasking and a better experience with graphically intensive applications. The 5G modem in the Poco X4 Pro 5G is a significant advantage for future network compatibility.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, can reach 70% in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. The Reno8 4G’s 33W charging is significantly slower. While both have similar battery capacity (likely around 5000mAh), the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s charging speed provides a substantial convenience advantage, minimizing downtime and allowing for quick top-ups throughout the day. The Reno8 4G also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a niche feature for charging accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 4G if you prioritize a clean software experience and efficient power management for everyday tasks, and 5G connectivity isn't a necessity. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you want faster performance for gaming and demanding apps, require 5G connectivity for future-proofing, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging – even if it means a slightly more customized software experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to use medium graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. While not a dedicated gaming chip, it offers a noticeable improvement over the Snapdragon 680 in the Reno8 4G, especially in sustained performance scenarios.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the 33W charging on the Oppo Reno8 4G in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G is significantly faster. It can charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 41 minutes, while the Reno8 4G will take considerably longer – likely over an hour and a half. This difference is particularly noticeable for quick top-ups when you're short on time.
❓ Is the software experience on the Poco X4 Pro 5G heavily modified with bloatware?
Xiaomi's MIUI software is known for its customization options, but it also comes with pre-installed apps (bloatware). While the amount of bloatware has decreased in recent versions, it's still more prevalent than the cleaner software experience typically found on Oppo's ColorOS. However, many of these apps can be uninstalled.
