The Realme 9 Pro+ and Oppo Reno8 4G represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Realme prioritizes raw performance with its Mediatek Dimensity 920, while the Oppo Reno8 4G focuses on a balance of efficiency and everyday usability with the Snapdragon 680. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding tasks, the Realme 9 Pro+ is the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 920 chipset and faster 60W charging. However, the Oppo Reno8 4G offers a more efficient processor for everyday tasks and a potentially longer-lasting battery experience, making it ideal for casual users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 17 | 2022, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 26 | Available. Released 2022, February 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.7 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| | IPX4 water resistant
RGB ring light around the camera (notifications, charging progress) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
5W reverse wired | 60W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 44 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dawnlight Gold, Starlight Black | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue, Free Fire Limited Edition |
| Models | CPH2457 | RMX3392, RMX3393 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | € 289.90 / $ 390.00 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 117h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 495096 (v8), 416031 (v9)
GeekBench: 2335 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno8 4G
- More power-efficient processor (Snapdragon 680)
- Potentially longer battery life for casual use
- Sleek and lightweight design (inferred from Oppo's design language)
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Realme 9 Pro+
- Slower 33W charging
- Limited gaming capabilities
Realme 9 Pro+
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 920 chipset
- 60W fast charging (0-100% in 44 minutes)
- Superior gaming performance
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- May run warmer during intensive tasks
- Less focus on power efficiency
Display Comparison
The provided data lacks detailed display specifications for either device. However, Realme often emphasizes high contrast ratios, advertising an 'Infinite' contrast ratio for the 9 Pro+. This suggests a vibrant display, though peak brightness and color accuracy remain unknown. The Oppo Reno8 4G's display specs are similarly absent, making a direct comparison impossible without further information. We can infer that both likely utilize AMOLED panels given the market segment, but the Realme's advertised contrast ratio hints at a potentially more visually striking experience.
Camera Comparison
The context data is limited regarding camera specifics. However, the Realme 9 Pro+ is likely to offer a more versatile camera system due to its higher processing power, enabling more complex image processing algorithms. While both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, the Dimensity 920's ISP (Image Signal Processor) will handle image data more efficiently and potentially deliver better low-light performance. Without sensor size or aperture information, a definitive camera comparison is impossible, but the Realme's chipset gives it a clear advantage in computational photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 9 Pro+'s Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the Oppo Reno8 4G's Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) with its 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver setup. The Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 920 offer significantly higher single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and smoother multitasking. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 920's architecture translates to a noticeable advantage in GPU performance, making the Realme 9 Pro+ the better choice for gamers. The Snapdragon 680 prioritizes efficiency, potentially leading to longer battery life during less demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Realme 9 Pro+ features a significant advantage in charging speed with its 60W wired charging, capable of a full charge in a claimed 44 minutes. The Oppo Reno8 4G's 33W charging is considerably slower. While the Realme 9 Pro+ has an endurance rating of 117 hours, the actual battery capacity isn't specified. The Snapdragon 680's efficiency in the Oppo Reno8 4G could potentially offset the difference in charging speed, offering comparable real-world battery life for typical usage. However, users who frequently need to top up their phone quickly will greatly benefit from the Realme's faster charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno8 4G if you need a reliable daily driver with good battery life and don't plan on intensive gaming or video editing. Its Snapdragon 680 excels at power efficiency. Buy the Realme 9 Pro+ if you prefer a phone capable of handling demanding games and applications, and value the convenience of significantly faster 60W charging. The Dimensity 920 provides a substantial performance boost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 920 in the Realme 9 Pro+ tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 920 is a powerful chip, it's generally well-managed in the Realme 9 Pro+. Realme employs cooling solutions to mitigate heat, but extended gaming at maximum settings will inevitably lead to some thermal throttling. However, it's unlikely to reach critically high temperatures that cause performance degradation.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Oppo Reno8 4G slow enough to be a significant inconvenience?
For casual users who charge their phone overnight, the 33W charging on the Oppo Reno8 4G is unlikely to be a major issue. However, if you frequently need a quick top-up during the day, the 60W charging on the Realme 9 Pro+ offers a much faster and more convenient experience.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 680's efficiency impact real-world battery life on the Oppo Reno8 4G?
The Snapdragon 680 is designed for power efficiency. This translates to longer battery life during typical usage scenarios like browsing, social media, and calls. While the Realme 9 Pro+ has a faster processor, it consumes more power, potentially resulting in shorter battery life for similar tasks.
