The Xiaomi Poco F4 and Oppo Reno7 represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Poco F4 prioritizes raw performance with its Snapdragon 870, while the Reno7 focuses on a balance of efficiency and everyday usability with the Snapdragon 680. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F4 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. While the Oppo Reno7 boasts slightly better battery endurance, the Poco F4’s faster charging and overall power outweigh this advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - Indonesia | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 - Indonesia | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 29 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 02 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back or eco leather back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | IPX4 water resistant
RGB ring light around the camera (notifications, charging progress) | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Sunset Orange | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | CPH2363 | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | About 240 EUR | ₹ 16,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 127h
|
Endurance rating 101h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.7 LUFS (Average)
|
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 289250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1653 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9)
GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 870
- Significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Much faster 67W charging
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Shorter battery endurance rating
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load (though mitigated by the 870's efficiency)
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Longer battery life (endurance rating of 127h)
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset
- 33W charging with 5W reverse wired charging
- Potentially better color science and software optimization
- Significantly slower performance
- Dimmer display, less usable outdoors
- Limited to 4G connectivity
Display Comparison
The Poco F4 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1003 nits compared to the Reno7’s 624 nits. This translates to vastly improved visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical OLED characteristics. However, the brightness difference is a key differentiator, making the Poco F4 more usable in bright environments. While neither specification details refresh rate, the Poco F4 is known to have a 120Hz display, a feature likely absent on the Reno7, further enhancing its visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but the specifics are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 870 in the Poco F4 offers a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Reno7’s camera system likely focuses on software optimization and color science, typical of Oppo’s approach. It’s reasonable to assume the Poco F4’s ISP will handle more complex computational photography tasks more effectively. We can safely ignore the likely presence of low-resolution macro lenses on both devices, as their utility is minimal.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Poco F4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a significant step up from the Reno7’s Snapdragon 680 4G (6nm). The 870 features a Kryo 585 architecture with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, compared to the 680’s 2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold cores. This results in markedly faster CPU and GPU performance, crucial for gaming and demanding applications. The 7nm process node of the 870, while older, is still more efficient at handling sustained loads than the 6nm node of the 680, meaning less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Poco F4’s 5G connectivity is another advantage, offering future-proofing and faster data speeds where available.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno7 claims an endurance rating of 127 hours, while the Poco F4 manages 101 hours. This suggests the Reno7 offers better overall battery life, likely due to the more efficient Snapdragon 680. However, the Poco F4 compensates with significantly faster charging: 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3, achieving a 100% charge in just 38 minutes. The Reno7’s 33W charging is considerably slower. This means while the Reno7 might last longer on a single charge, the Poco F4 can quickly top up its battery, minimizing downtime. The 5W reverse wired charging on the Reno7 is a niche feature, while the Poco F4 lacks this capability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno7 if you prioritize long-lasting battery life and a smooth, efficient experience for everyday tasks like social media and browsing. It’s a solid choice for users who don’t heavily game or run resource-intensive apps. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F4 if you demand high performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking. The Snapdragon 870 delivers a flagship-level experience at a mid-range price, making it perfect for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 870 in the Poco F4 get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 870 is a powerful chip, it's known for being relatively efficient. The Poco F4's cooling system is adequate for sustained gaming, but some warmth is expected. It's unlikely to experience severe throttling like older flagship chips, but prolonged, demanding games may lead to a slight reduction in performance over time.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Oppo Reno7 slow compared to the Poco F4's 67W?
Yes, the 33W charging on the Reno7 is considerably slower. The Poco F4 can fully charge in approximately 38 minutes, while the Reno7 will take significantly longer – likely over an hour. This difference is substantial for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Will the lack of 5G on the Oppo Reno7 be a significant limitation in the coming years?
For most users today, the lack of 5G on the Reno7 isn't a major issue, as 5G coverage is still limited in many areas. However, as 5G networks expand, the Poco F4's 5G connectivity will become increasingly valuable, offering faster data speeds and future-proofing.
