The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno7 and Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE represent compelling options for users seeking a balance of features and affordability. While both devices share a similar aesthetic and price point, significant differences in their underlying hardware dictate distinct user experiences. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Reno7’s Snapdragon 680, making it better suited for demanding tasks and gaming. However, the Reno7 offers comparable battery endurance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - Indonesia | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 - Indonesia | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 29 | 2021, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 02 | Available. Released 2021, October 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back or eco leather back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 160.5 x 75.7 x 6.8 mm (6.32 x 2.98 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 158 g (5.57 oz) |
| | IPX4 water resistant
RGB ring light around the camera (notifications, charging progress) | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 90Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2 (Global), 5.1 (India) |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 (Global), Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (India) |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
5W reverse wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4250 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Sunset Orange | Truffle Black (Vinyl Black), Bubblegum Blue (Jazz Blue), Peach Pink (Tuscany Coral), Snowflake White (Diamond Dazzle) |
| Models | CPH2363 | 2109119DG, 2107119DC, 2109119DI |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.95 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 127h
|
Endurance rating 122h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.7 LUFS (Average)
|
-23.6 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 289250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1653 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 527663 (v9)
GeekBench: 2832 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7
- Slightly better battery endurance (127h rating)
- Includes 5W reverse wired charging
- Higher peak display brightness (624 nits)
- Less powerful Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Limited to 4G connectivity
- Potentially less advanced image processing
Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE
- More powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Superior ISP for better image processing
- Slightly lower battery endurance (122h rating)
- Lacks reverse wired charging
- Potentially lower peak brightness
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo Reno7 and Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. However, the Reno7 boasts a measured peak brightness of 624 nits, which is a crucial advantage in outdoor visibility. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Reno7’s higher brightness translates to a more usable experience under direct sunlight. The lack of high refresh rate information for either device suggests a standard 60Hz panel, which is typical for this price bracket, but a potential drawback for users accustomed to smoother scrolling.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is absent. Given the market positioning, it’s likely both feature a primary camera around the 64MP mark. However, the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE’s Snapdragon 778G ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more advanced, offering better image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions. The Reno7’s ISP, while competent, is less sophisticated. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) makes it difficult to assess video stabilization performance, but it’s a feature often found in Xiaomi’s mid-range offerings.
Performance
The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm), featuring a Cortex-A78 prime core clocked at 2.4GHz. This is a significant step up from the Oppo Reno7’s Snapdragon 680 4G (6nm) and its Kryo 265 Gold cores peaking at 2.4GHz. The 778G’s architecture, with its more powerful Cortex-A78 core, delivers superior single-core and multi-core performance. The 5G modem in the Xiaomi also provides future-proofing and faster data speeds where available. The Reno7’s 4G limitation is a notable disadvantage in areas with expanding 5G infrastructure.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno7 boasts an endurance rating of 127 hours, slightly exceeding the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE’s 122 hours. This suggests the Reno7 may offer marginally better battery life in typical usage scenarios. Both devices support 33W wired charging, allowing for a full charge in approximately 60-70 minutes. The Reno7 also includes 5W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories, which the Xiaomi lacks. However, the Xiaomi’s more efficient chipset may offset the slightly smaller battery capacity in real-world use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno7 if you prioritize a consistently smooth experience for everyday tasks and value a slightly longer battery life, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power. Buy the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE if you’re a more demanding user who enjoys mobile gaming, frequently uses resource-intensive apps, or wants a phone that will remain responsive for longer. The 5G connectivity of the Xiaomi is also a key advantage for future network compatibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 680 in the Oppo Reno7 struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 680 is a mid-range chipset and will likely require significant graphics settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates in demanding titles like Genshin Impact. The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE’s Snapdragon 778G offers a much smoother gaming experience with higher graphical fidelity.
❓ Does the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE support carrier aggregation for faster 5G speeds?
While the specifications don't explicitly state carrier aggregation support, the Snapdragon 778G generally supports a wide range of 5G bands and carrier aggregation technologies. This means you're more likely to achieve faster 5G speeds on the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE, provided your carrier supports it.
❓ Is the lack of a dedicated macro camera on the Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE a significant drawback?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras found on many smartphones produce images of limited quality. The Xiaomi 11 Lite 5G NE’s reliance on the main sensor for close-up shots, combined with its superior image processing, will likely yield better results than a dedicated, low-resolution macro lens.
