The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno7 and Samsung Galaxy A54 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features and attractive designs, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 edges out the Oppo Reno7 thanks to its significantly brighter display, more powerful chipset, and generally more polished software experience. While the Reno7 boasts impressive battery endurance, the A54's overall package makes it the slightly better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - Indonesia | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 - Indonesia | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 29 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 02 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back or eco leather back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | IPX4 water resistant
RGB ring light around the camera (notifications, charging progress) | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Sunset Orange | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | CPH2363 | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 127h
|
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.7 LUFS (Average)
|
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 289250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1653 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7
- Exceptional battery life
- Sleek and stylish design
- Decent camera performance
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower display brightness
- Software updates may be less frequent
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- More powerful chipset for smoother performance
- Excellent camera quality
- Samsung's reliable software support
- IP67 water and dust resistance
- Slower charging speed (25W)
- Design can be considered less exciting than Reno7
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured peak brightness of 980 nits is substantially higher than the Reno7's 624 nits, making it much easier to see outdoors. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (nominally infinite), but the A54's brightness advantage is a significant factor. The A54 also likely has better color accuracy and vibrancy, typical of Samsung's AMOLED panels.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the A54 likely has a slight edge in image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. Samsung's image processing is generally well-regarded. The Reno7's camera is still very good, offering detailed photos and decent video recording, but the A54's hardware and software optimization likely give it a slight advantage. Both offer versatile camera setups with wide, ultrawide, and macro lenses.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A54's Exynos 1380 (5nm) generally outperforms the Oppo Reno7's Snapdragon 680 (6nm). The Exynos 1380 offers a more modern architecture and better overall processing power, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance. While the Reno7's chipset is capable, it's not in the same league as the A54's.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno7 demonstrates impressive battery endurance with an endurance rating of 127h, slightly exceeding the A54's 119h. However, active use scores show the A54 provides around 11:15h of usage, which is still very respectable. While the Reno7 has a slight theoretical advantage, real-world usage may not show a dramatic difference.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 is a great pick for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a sleek design. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is ideal for those who value a vibrant display, smoother performance, and the reliability of the Samsung ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Oppo Reno7 has a slightly higher endurance rating, but the Samsung Galaxy A54 still offers excellent battery life for a full day of use.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A54 worth the extra money?
Generally, yes. The A54's superior display, performance, and software support make it a worthwhile investment for most users.