The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno7 and Samsung Galaxy A34 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features and attractive designs, but which one truly comes out on top? This comprehensive comparison will break down every aspect, helping you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 edges out the Oppo Reno7 thanks to its significantly brighter display, more powerful chipset, and faster charging. While the Reno7 boasts impressive battery life, the A34's overall package provides a more premium and versatile experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - Indonesia | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 - Indonesia | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 29 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 02 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back or eco leather back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | IPX4 water resistant
RGB ring light around the camera (notifications, charging progress) | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Sunset Orange | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | CPH2363 | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 127h
|
Endurance rating 133h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.7 LUFS (Average)
|
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 289250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1653 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 472126 (v9)
GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7
- Exceptional battery life
- Sleek and stylish design
- Reverse wired charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower display brightness
- Potentially less versatile camera
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Brighter and smoother display
- More powerful processor
- Faster charging
- Likely better camera versatility
- Slightly shorter battery life (marginally)
- Design may be less distinctive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34's display is a clear winner. With a measured peak brightness of 1009 nits, it's significantly brighter than the Reno7's 624 nits, making it much easier to see outdoors. Both have infinite contrast ratios (nominal), but the A34's brightness advantage is undeniable. The A34 likely also has a higher refresh rate (typically 120Hz) compared to the Reno7 (likely 60Hz), further enhancing the viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the A34 likely has a more versatile setup. While specific camera specs are missing, Samsung generally excels in camera processing and offers features like OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) which the Reno7 may lack. The A34's camera likely offers better low-light performance and video recording capabilities.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A34's Mediatek Dimensity 1080 chipset offers a noticeable performance boost over the Oppo Reno7's Snapdragon 680. The Dimensity 1080's Cortex-A78 cores provide better CPU performance for demanding tasks and gaming. While both have octa-core processors, the A34's architecture is more efficient and powerful.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno7 and Samsung Galaxy A34 have very similar endurance ratings (127h vs 133h), indicating comparable battery life. However, the A34's charging speed is faster at 25W compared to the Reno7's 33W wired charging, although the Reno7 has a 5W reverse wired charging feature.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 is ideal for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a sleek design. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a better choice for those who value a vibrant display, smoother performance, and a more modern software experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A34's Dimensity 1080 chipset provides significantly better gaming performance than the Oppo Reno7's Snapdragon 680.
❓ Is the Oppo Reno7's reverse charging useful?
The reverse charging feature on the Oppo Reno7 can be handy for topping up accessories like earbuds or smartwatches, but it's not a primary reason to choose the phone.
