The Oppo Reno series consistently delivers stylish phones with impressive features. Choosing between the Reno7 and Reno8 T 5G can be tricky, as both offer compelling value. This comprehensive comparison breaks down the key differences to help you make the best decision for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 T 5G emerges as the winner thanks to its significantly faster charging, 5G connectivity, and a more modern chipset. While the Reno7 boasts exceptional battery life, the Reno8 T 5G's overall improvements make it the more appealing choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - Indonesia | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 - Indonesia | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 29 | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 02 | Available. Released 2023, February 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back or eco leather back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 162.3 x 74.3 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| | IPX4 water resistant
RGB ring light around the camera (notifications, charging progress) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP, f/3.3, 34mm (microscope)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD, 100% in 44 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Sunset Orange | Black Starlight (Midnight Black), Dawn Gold (Sunrise Gold) |
| Models | CPH2363 | CPH2505 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 340 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 127h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.7 LUFS (Average)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 289250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1653 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno7
- Exceptional battery life
- Compact design
- Stylish design
- Good camera performance
- No 5G connectivity
- Slower charging
- Older chipset
Oppo Reno8 T 5G
- 5G connectivity
- Fast charging (67W)
- More powerful chipset
- Improved performance
- Slightly larger size
- Battery life not as exceptional as Reno7
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Reno8 T 5G likely has a slightly higher refresh rate (assumed 90Hz or 120Hz) compared to the Reno7 (likely 60Hz), resulting in smoother scrolling and animations. Brightness is comparable, with the Reno7 measuring 624 nits, and the Reno8 T 5G expected to be similar or slightly higher.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Reno8 T 5G likely benefits from software optimizations and potentially a slightly improved sensor. Expect similar image quality in good lighting conditions, but the Reno8 T 5G might offer better low-light performance. Video recording capabilities are likely comparable, both supporting 1080p or 4K recording.
Performance
The Reno8 T 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset is a noticeable upgrade over the Reno7's Snapdragon 680 4G. The 695 offers better CPU and GPU performance, leading to snappier app loading, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming experiences. The Reno7 is still capable for everyday tasks, but the Reno8 T 5G provides a more future-proof and responsive experience.
Battery Life
The Reno7 shines in this category with an exceptional endurance rating of 127 hours. The Reno8 T 5G, while still offering good battery life, won't match the Reno7's longevity. However, the Reno8 T 5G's 67W charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 44 minutes, a significant advantage over the Reno7's 33W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 is ideal for users prioritizing long battery life and a slightly more compact design. It's a solid choice for those who don't need 5G. The Oppo Reno8 T 5G is perfect for those who want faster charging, 5G capabilities, and a more powerful processor for smoother performance and future-proofing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno8 T 5G worth the upgrade from the Reno7?
If you value 5G connectivity, faster charging, and improved performance, then the Reno8 T 5G is a worthwhile upgrade. However, if battery life is your absolute top priority, the Reno7 remains a strong contender.
❓ What is the difference between the Snapdragon 680 and 695 chipsets?
The Snapdragon 695 5G offers improved CPU and GPU performance compared to the Snapdragon 680 4G, and it supports 5G connectivity. This translates to a smoother and more responsive user experience.
