The Oppo Reno7 series offers stylish designs and impressive features, but choosing between the 4G and 5G variants can be tricky. Both phones boast sleek aesthetics and capable cameras, but significant differences lie under the hood. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which Reno7 is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno7 5G takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging, more powerful chipset, and 5G connectivity. While the Reno7 offers excellent battery life, the 5G model's overall performance and charging speed make it the better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - Indonesia | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 - Indonesia | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 29 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 02 | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back or eco leather back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| | IPX4 water resistant
RGB ring light around the camera (notifications, charging progress) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
5W reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Sunset Orange | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | CPH2363 | CPH2371 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 127h
|
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.7 LUFS (Average)
|
-29.4 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 289250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1653 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9)
GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7
- Exceptional battery life
- Slightly more affordable
- Stylish design
- Slower charging
- Less powerful chipset
- No 5G connectivity
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Faster charging (65W)
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 900)
- 5G connectivity
- Slightly brighter display
- Slightly shorter battery life (though still good)
- Higher price
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar OLED displays with excellent contrast (Infinite nominal). The Reno7 5G edges out the Reno7 with a slightly higher peak brightness of 635 nits versus 624 nits, resulting in marginally better outdoor visibility. Both offer vibrant colors and sharp details, making them enjoyable for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, detailed camera specifications are missing. Based on general knowledge, both likely feature a primary 64MP sensor and a suite of supporting lenses. Image quality will likely be comparable in good lighting conditions, but the Reno7 5G's more powerful processor may offer slightly better image processing and low-light performance. Video recording capabilities are likely similar.
Performance
The Reno7 5G's MediaTek Dimensity 900 chipset provides a substantial performance boost over the Reno7's Snapdragon 680. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the 5G model. The Dimensity 900's architecture is simply more powerful and efficient.
Battery Life
The Reno7 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 127 hours, slightly surpassing the Reno7 5G's 123 hours. However, the Reno7 5G's 65W fast charging is a game-changer, allowing it to charge from 0% to 100% in just 31 minutes, a significant advantage over the Reno7's 33W charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 is ideal for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a slightly more affordable price point, especially if 5G isn't a necessity. The Oppo Reno7 5G is perfect for those who demand faster performance, quicker charging, and future-proof 5G connectivity, even if it comes at a slightly higher cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno7 5G worth the extra cost?
If you value performance, fast charging, and 5G connectivity, then yes, the Reno7 5G is worth the extra investment. The improved chipset and charging speed significantly enhance the user experience.
❓ How does the battery life of the Reno7 compare to other phones?
The Oppo Reno7 offers excellent battery life, easily lasting a full day of moderate to heavy use. It's among the best in its class for battery endurance.
