Oppo's Reno and F series consistently deliver stylish designs and competitive features. The Reno7 and F21 Pro are no exception, both targeting the mid-range market. But which one offers the best value and performance for your needs? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo F21 Pro edges out the Reno7 thanks to its faster charging and potentially improved design (assuming similar build quality). Both offer excellent battery life and a capable Snapdragon 680 chipset, making the charging speed the deciding factor for many users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - Indonesia | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 - Indonesia | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 29 | 2022, April 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 02 | Available. Released 2022, April 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back or eco leather back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| | IPX4 water resistant
RGB ring light around the camera (notifications, charging progress) | IPX4 water resistant
RGB ring light around the camera (notifications, charging progress) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
5W reverse wired | 33W wired, 100% in 60 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Sunset Orange | Cosmic Black, Sunset Orange, Dawnlight Gold, Starlight Black |
| Models | CPH2363 | CPH2363, CPH2461 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 280 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 127h
|
Endurance rating 127h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.7 LUFS (Average)
|
-29.7 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 289250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1653 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 289250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1653 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7
- Potentially more refined design
- Higher display brightness (624 nits)
- Potentially better camera processing
- Slower charging compared to F21 Pro
- No specific charging time mentioned
Oppo F21 Pro
- Faster 33W charging (60 min charge)
- Potentially more vibrant design
- Reverse wired charging
- Lower display brightness compared to Reno7
- Camera performance potentially less advanced
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar display technology, likely AMOLED panels, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Reno7 boasts a measured peak brightness of 624 nits, which is a significant advantage for outdoor visibility. While both claim an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (a nominal value), the Reno7's higher brightness gives it a slight edge in real-world usage.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are not fully detailed, but both phones are advertised as having capable camera systems. The Reno7 often features a more sophisticated camera setup in previous iterations, potentially offering better image processing and features. The F21 Pro may focus on selfie camera capabilities. A direct comparison would require detailed testing and sample images.
Performance
Powered by the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G chipset and Octa-core CPU, performance should be largely identical between the two devices. Expect smooth everyday usage, but don't expect flagship-level gaming performance. RAM and storage configurations will likely vary depending on the specific model, impacting multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
Both devices share the same impressive endurance rating of 127h, indicating exceptional battery life. However, the F21 Pro's 33W wired charging with a 60-minute charge time is a significant advantage over the Reno7's 33W charging (without a specific charge time mentioned) and 5W reverse wired charging.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 is a good choice for users prioritizing a slightly more refined design and potentially a more mature software experience (depending on updates). The Oppo F21 Pro is ideal for those who value fast charging and a potentially more vibrant design, especially if camera features are a secondary concern.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both the Oppo Reno7 and F21 Pro have an endurance rating of 127h, indicating excellent battery life. They perform similarly in this aspect.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 680 chipset good for gaming?
The Snapdragon 680 is a capable mid-range chipset suitable for everyday tasks and casual gaming. However, it's not designed for demanding, high-graphics games.
