The OnePlus Nord 2T and Oppo Reno7 occupy a similar price bracket, aiming to deliver a compelling smartphone experience without breaking the bank. However, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this. The Reno7 prioritizes a sleek design and decent battery life, while the Nord 2T focuses on raw performance and incredibly fast charging. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2T emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 1300 chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the Reno7’s Snapdragon 680, and the 80W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer. While the Reno7 boasts respectable endurance, the Nord 2T’s speed and power make it the more versatile choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - Indonesia | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 - Indonesia | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 29 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 02 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back or eco leather back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| | IPX4 water resistant
RGB ring light around the camera (notifications, charging progress) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Auto HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
5W reverse wired | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Sunset Orange | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | CPH2363 | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 127h
|
Endurance rating 100h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.7 LUFS (Average)
|
-25.6 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 289250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1653 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9)
GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7
- Longer battery endurance (127h)
- Sleek and stylish design (based on brand aesthetic)
- Potentially more efficient chipset for basic tasks
- Significantly slower performance compared to Nord 2T
- Slower 33W charging
- Less capable chipset for gaming and demanding apps
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Much faster performance with Dimensity 1300
- Incredibly fast 80W SuperVOOC charging
- Supports PD charging for wider compatibility
- Shorter battery endurance (100h)
- Potentially more heat generation under heavy load
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo Reno7 and OnePlus Nord 2T feature displays with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, typical for OLED panels. However, the Nord 2T edges ahead with a measured peak brightness of 636 nits, compared to the Reno7’s 624 nits. While the difference isn’t massive, it translates to slightly better visibility in direct sunlight. Both likely employ similar PWM dimming strategies, but without specific data, it’s difficult to assess which is better for users sensitive to flicker. Bezels appear comparable in marketing materials, suggesting a similar overall immersive experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer a 'Photo / Video' camera experience, but specifics are lacking. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the chipset advantage of the Nord 2T suggests superior image processing capabilities, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Reno7’s camera system likely focuses on a balance of image quality and efficiency, while the Nord 2T can leverage its processing power for more advanced computational photography features. The presence of OIS on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for video stabilization and low-light photography.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The OnePlus Nord 2T’s Mediatek Dimensity 1300, built on a 6nm process, is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Reno7’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (also 6nm). The Dimensity 1300’s octa-core configuration – featuring a high-clocked Cortex-A78 prime core – delivers significantly faster CPU and GPU performance. The Reno7’s Kryo 265 cores, while efficient, simply can’t compete in demanding tasks like gaming or video editing. The Nord 2T is better equipped for sustained workloads, potentially experiencing less throttling under heavy load. While both likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, the chipset advantage of the Nord 2T will be the deciding factor for most users.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno7 boasts an endurance rating of 127 hours, while the OnePlus Nord 2T manages 100 hours. This suggests the Reno7 offers better overall battery life, likely due to the less power-hungry Snapdragon 680. However, the Nord 2T’s 80W SuperVOOC charging completely changes the equation. A full charge from 0-100% takes significantly less time on the Nord 2T, mitigating the slightly lower endurance. The Reno7’s 33W charging is comparatively slow. The Nord 2T also supports PD (Power Delivery), offering wider compatibility with chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno7 if you prioritize a balanced experience with a focus on battery longevity and a more understated aesthetic. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse social media, make calls, and occasionally take photos. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you demand faster performance for gaming or demanding apps, and value the convenience of incredibly rapid charging. This phone is geared towards power users and those who frequently find themselves needing a quick top-up.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 1300 in the Nord 2T get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 1300 is a powerful chip, it can generate more heat than the Snapdragon 680. However, OnePlus typically implements effective thermal management solutions. Expect some warmth during prolonged gaming, but significant throttling is unlikely. The Reno7, while cooler, will sacrifice performance to maintain lower temperatures.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to fully charge the OnePlus Nord 2T with the 80W charger?
OnePlus claims the Nord 2T can charge from 1-100% in approximately 27 minutes with the 80W SuperVOOC charger. This is a significant advantage over the Reno7’s 33W charging, which will take considerably longer – likely over an hour.
❓ Is the difference in battery endurance (127h vs 100h) significant in real-world use?
While 27 hours sounds substantial, the impact is often less dramatic in practice. The Nord 2T’s 80W charging allows for quick top-ups, minimizing range anxiety. Most users will find the convenience of fast charging outweighs the slightly shorter battery life.
