The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Motorola Edge 30 Neo and Oppo Reno7 represent compelling options for users seeking a balance of features and affordability. While both devices aim for a similar demographic, they diverge significantly in key areas like display technology, processing power, and charging speed. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo emerges as the stronger contender. Its significantly brighter display, 5G connectivity via the Snapdragon 695, and substantially faster 68W charging outweigh the Reno7’s slightly better endurance rating. The Reno7 remains a viable option for those prioritizing battery longevity above all else.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - Indonesia | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 - Indonesia | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 29 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 02 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back or eco leather back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| | IPX4 water resistant
RGB ring light around the camera (notifications, charging progress) | Splash and dust resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
5W reverse wired | 68W wired
5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Sunset Orange | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | CPH2363 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 127h
|
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.7 LUFS (Average)
|
-26.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 289250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1653 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 380818 (v9)
GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7
- Longer battery endurance (127h)
- Reverse wired charging (5W)
- Potentially lower price point (depending on region)
- Limited to 4G connectivity
- Slower 33W charging
- Dimmer display (624 nits)
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Brighter display (1004 nits)
- 5G connectivity (Snapdragon 695)
- Faster 68W wired charging
- Wireless charging (5W)
- Shorter battery endurance (104h)
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a considerable advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1004 nits compared to the Oppo Reno7’s 624 nits. This difference translates to significantly better visibility outdoors and a more immersive viewing experience in bright environments. Both phones share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting standard AMOLED performance, but the Neo’s brightness is the defining factor. While neither manufacturer specifies refresh rates, the brighter panel on the Neo will be more appreciated for media consumption and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both utilize similar mid-range camera systems. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout performer in photography, focusing instead on all-around usability. We can expect similar performance in typical shooting conditions, with image processing likely being the differentiating factor.
Performance
Under the hood, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset represents a step up from the Oppo Reno7’s Snapdragon 680. The 695, built on a 6nm process like the 680, offers 5G connectivity, a crucial advantage for future-proofing. The CPU configuration also differs: the Neo features a 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver setup, while the Reno7 has 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver. While clock speeds aren't everything, the 695’s architecture and 5G modem provide a more modern and versatile experience. The Reno7’s 4G limitation will become increasingly noticeable over time.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno7 holds a slight edge in endurance, achieving a 127-hour rating versus the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s 104 hours. However, this advantage is offset by the Neo’s dramatically faster 68W wired charging, compared to the Reno7’s 33W. This means the Neo can replenish its battery much more quickly, minimizing downtime. The Neo also adds 5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Reno7. The Reno7’s longer endurance is beneficial for infrequent chargers, but the Neo’s charging speed is a game-changer for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno7 if you prioritize maximum battery life and are content with 4G connectivity. Its 127-hour endurance rating is ideal for users who frequently find themselves away from a power source. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you value a vibrant, bright display, future-proof 5G capabilities, and incredibly fast charging – perfect for users who are always on the go and demand a responsive experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Motorola Edge 30 Neo offer a noticeable performance improvement over the Snapdragon 680 in the Oppo Reno7 for everyday tasks?
Yes, while both chipsets are mid-range, the Snapdragon 695 provides a smoother experience for multitasking and app loading due to its more modern architecture and slightly faster CPU cores. The difference won't be dramatic for basic usage, but it will be noticeable when running more demanding applications or switching between several apps simultaneously.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Motorola Edge 30 Neo with the 68W charger compared to the Oppo Reno7’s 33W charger?
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo can charge from 0-100% in approximately 40-50 minutes with the 68W charger. The Oppo Reno7, with its 33W charger, will typically take around 70-90 minutes for a full charge. This difference is substantial and caters to users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Given the Reno7's longer battery endurance, is it a better choice for travel where access to power outlets is limited?
While the Reno7's 127-hour endurance is advantageous, the Edge 30 Neo's faster charging mitigates this benefit. Even with a shorter battery life, the Neo can quickly top up when a power source is available, making it a viable option for travel, especially if you have access to a power bank or charging adapter.
