The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo Reno7 and Honor 70 Lite represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both aim to deliver a solid experience, they take different approaches to chipset selection and feature prioritization. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device offers the best overall package.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Reno7 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 680, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a smoother experience and better endurance, despite the Honor 70 Lite's 5G connectivity. The Reno7's superior battery endurance rating of 127 hours further solidifies its advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - Indonesia | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 - Indonesia | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 29 | 2023, March 20 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 02 | Available. Released 2023, March 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back or eco leather back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 163.7 x 75.1 x 8.7 mm (6.44 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| | IPX4 water resistant
RGB ring light around the camera (notifications, charging progress) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) | TFT LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.9 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Magic UI 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | Unspecified |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP, f/3.3, (microscope)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
5W reverse wired | 22.5W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Sunset Orange | Ocean Blue, Titanium Silver, Midnight Black |
| Models | CPH2363 | RBN-NX1 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 120 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 127h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-29.7 LUFS (Average)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 289250 (v9)
GeekBench: 1653 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Oppo Reno7
- Superior battery endurance (127h)
- Faster 33W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 680 processor
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Camera details are unknown
Honor 70 Lite
- 5G connectivity
- More modern 8nm chipset
- Potentially lower price point
- Slower Snapdragon 480+ processor
- Slower 22.5W charging
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno7 boasts a display capable of reaching 624 nits of peak brightness, ensuring good visibility even outdoors. While the Honor 70 Lite's display specifications are not provided, it's reasonable to assume it falls slightly behind in peak brightness given its overall positioning. Both devices feature an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of modern LCD/OLED panels. The Reno7's brightness advantage will be noticeable when viewing HDR content or using the phone in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Given the market segment, it's likely both rely on multi-camera setups with a primary sensor and supporting lenses. Without sensor size or aperture information, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, Oppo generally focuses on image processing algorithms that prioritize vibrant colors and detail, while Honor tends towards a more natural look. The absence of details suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno7 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm), while the Honor 70 Lite features the Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8nm). Despite the 8nm process of the 480+, the Snapdragon 680's newer architecture and higher clock speeds (2.4 GHz Kryo Gold vs 2.2 GHz Kryo 460) translate to better overall performance. The 6nm node also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Honor 70 Lite's 5G capability is its key advantage, but the Reno7's CPU configuration – with four performance cores clocked at 2.4 GHz – will handle demanding applications more effectively.
Battery Life
The Oppo Reno7’s endurance rating of 127 hours is a significant advantage. While the Honor 70 Lite’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Reno7’s superior endurance suggests a more efficient combination of battery size and power consumption. The Reno7 also supports 33W wired charging, considerably faster than the Honor 70 Lite’s 22.5W charging. This translates to quicker top-ups, minimizing downtime. The Reno7 also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Honor 70 Lite.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno7 if you prioritize sustained performance, longer battery life, and a generally more refined user experience. It's ideal for users who frequently multitask, enjoy media consumption, or need a phone that can reliably last a full day. Buy the Honor 70 Lite if 5G connectivity is a non-negotiable requirement and you're willing to accept slightly lower performance and battery life in exchange. It's a good fit for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks and occasional 5G downloads.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 680 in the Oppo Reno7 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 680 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to stick to medium graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. The 6nm process and higher clock speeds offer a performance edge over the Snapdragon 480+, but it's not a flagship-level chipset.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Oppo Reno7 compared to the 22.5W charging on the Honor 70 Lite?
While exact charging times depend on battery capacity (which isn't specified for the Honor 70 Lite), 33W charging will significantly reduce the time to reach 100%. Expect a noticeably quicker top-up with the Reno7, potentially shaving off 30-60 minutes for a full charge.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Honor 70 Lite worth sacrificing performance for?
That depends on your network coverage and data needs. If you live in an area with widespread 5G availability and frequently download large files or stream high-resolution video, the 5G connectivity could be beneficial. However, if 5G isn't readily available or you primarily use Wi-Fi, the performance advantage of the Oppo Reno7 is likely more valuable.
