Oppo Reno7 Z 5G vs Xiaomi 12 Lite: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses

The Oppo Reno7 Z 5G and Xiaomi 12 Lite both target the competitive mid-range smartphone market, but approach it with different strengths. The Reno7 Z focuses on a balanced experience, while the 12 Lite prioritizes a premium feel and faster charging. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Xiaomi 12 Lite emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Reno7 Z 5G’s Snapdragon 695, and the significantly faster 67W charging is a game-changer. While battery endurance is rated the same, the charging speed makes the 12 Lite more forgiving.

PHONES
Phone Names	Oppo Reno7 Z 5G	Xiaomi 12 Lite

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66
5G bands	1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G

Launch
Announced	2022, March 02	2022, July 09
Status	Available. Released 2022, March 21	Available. Released 2022, July 11

Body
Build	-	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame
Dimensions	159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in)	159.3 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.27 x 2.90 x 0.29 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	173 g (6.10 oz)	173 g (6.10 oz)
	IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress)	-

Display
Protection	-	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)
Size	6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio)	6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM)	AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 950 nits (peak)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)	Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)	Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)
GPU	Adreno 619	Adreno 642L
OS	Android 12, ColorOS 12	Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS

Memory
Card slot	microSDXC	No
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM	128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2

Main Camera
Features	LED flash, HDR, panorama	Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Single	16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm	32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF
Triple	64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens	108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video	1080p@30fps	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS

Selfie camera
Features	HDR, panorama	HDR, panorama
Single	16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm	32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	No
35mm jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes, with dual speakers
	-	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD	5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive
Infrared port	-	Yes
NFC	Yes	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS	GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1)
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
	-	Virtual proximity sensing

Battery
Charging	33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired	67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 50% in 13 min
Type	Li-Po 4500 mAh	Li-Po 4300 mAh

Misc
Colors	Black, Rainbow	Black, Lite Green, Lite Pink
Models	CPH2343	2203129G
Price	About 350 EUR	€ 119.80 / $ 269.00 / £ 121.15
SAR	-	1.09 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	-	0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 100h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-25.2 LUFS (Very good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 528905 (v9) GeekBench: 2943 (v5.1) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Oppo Reno7 Z 5G

Potentially more affordable price point
Balanced overall feature set
Reverse wired charging capability

Less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
Slower 33W charging
Display likely less bright than the 12 Lite

Xiaomi 12 Lite

Faster Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
Significantly faster 67W charging
Brighter display with higher contrast

Potentially higher price
No reverse wired charging
Battery endurance rating is the same as the Reno7 Z 5G

Display Comparison

The Xiaomi 12 Lite boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 824 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno7 Z 5G. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the 12 Lite’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deeper blacks. Bezels are likely comparable, given both phones aim for a modern aesthetic, but the 12 Lite’s overall display experience is demonstrably superior due to its brightness.

Camera Comparison

Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Reno7 Z 5G. The Xiaomi 12 Lite likely benefits from a more sophisticated image processing pipeline, leveraging the increased processing power of the Snapdragon 778G. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture details for the Reno7 Z, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the 12 Lite’s chipset advantage suggests better low-light performance and faster image processing. We can safely assume both phones include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the 12 Lite is likely to deliver more refined results.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 12 Lite’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a significant step up from the Oppo Reno7 Z 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The 778G features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores – versus the Reno7 Z’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the 12 Lite. While both use 6nm fabrication, the architectural advantages of the 778G are clear.

Battery Life

Interestingly, both phones share a 100-hour endurance rating, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity (not specified for either device). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Xiaomi 12 Lite’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC4, can reach 50% charge in just 13 minutes. The Oppo Reno7 Z 5G’s 33W wired charging, with PD support, takes 31% in 15 minutes and 100% in 63 minutes. This makes the 12 Lite far more convenient for users who need a quick power boost.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo Reno7 Z 5G if you prioritize a slightly more conservative design and are on a tighter budget. It’s a solid all-rounder for everyday tasks. Buy the Xiaomi 12 Lite if you value faster performance for gaming and demanding apps, and appreciate the convenience of incredibly rapid 67W charging. It’s the better choice for power users and those who frequently find themselves needing a quick top-up.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the Xiaomi 12 Lite get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the Snapdragon 695 in the Reno7 Z 5G?

While both chipsets are 6nm, the 778G is more powerful and therefore *can* generate more heat under sustained load. However, Xiaomi typically employs effective thermal management solutions, and the 12 Lite’s larger surface area may help dissipate heat. The Reno7 Z 5G’s lower performance ceiling means it’s less likely to reach thermal throttling limits, but it will also deliver lower frame rates in demanding games.

❓ Is the 67W charging on the Xiaomi 12 Lite compatible with all USB-PD chargers, or do I need a specific charger to achieve the fastest speeds?

The Xiaomi 12 Lite supports USB-PD and QC4, but to achieve the full 67W charging speed, it’s recommended to use the charger included in the box or a USB-PD charger specifically rated for 67W output. While it will charge with lower-wattage USB-PD chargers, the charging speed will be significantly reduced.

❓ How does the camera performance of the Xiaomi 12 Lite compare in low-light conditions, considering the lack of specific sensor details for the Oppo Reno7 Z 5G?

The Xiaomi 12 Lite likely excels in low-light photography due to the Snapdragon 778G’s superior image signal processor (ISP) and potentially larger sensor. The ISP handles noise reduction and detail preservation more effectively, resulting in clearer and more vibrant low-light images. Without knowing the Reno7 Z 5G’s sensor size and aperture, it’s difficult to provide a precise comparison, but the 12 Lite has a clear advantage in processing power.