Oppo's Reno series consistently delivers stylish designs and impressive features. Choosing between the Reno7 Z 5G and the Reno8 can be tricky, as both offer compelling packages. This comprehensive comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to help you make the right decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno8 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster charging, more powerful chipset, and brighter display. While the Reno7 Z 5G offers a more budget-friendly option, the Reno8's performance and charging speed justify the price difference for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 02 | 2022, July 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 21 | Available. Released 2022, July 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 160.6 x 73.4 x 7.7 mm (6.32 x 2.89 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | IPX4, dust and water resistant
RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 23mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired | 80W wired, 50% in 11 min, 100% in 28 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Rainbow | Shimmer Gold, Shimmer Black |
| Models | CPH2343 | CPH2359 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | £ 279.99 / € 158.14 / ₹ 24,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 105h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.7 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 619610a (v9)
GeekBench: 2694 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 Z 5G
- Stylish Design
- 5G Connectivity
- Affordable Price
- Reverse Wired Charging
- Slower Charging
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Dimmer Display
- Lower Performance
Oppo Reno8
- Faster Charging (80W)
- More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 1300)
- Brighter Display
- Improved Performance
- Potentially Better Camera
- Higher Price
- Design may be less distinctive
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno8 boasts a significantly brighter display, measured at 633 nits, offering better visibility in sunlight. While the Reno7 Z 5G's display is adequate, it lacks the same punch and vibrancy. The Reno8's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent black levels and image depth, further enhancing the viewing experience. Both phones likely feature similar OLED panel technology, but the Reno8's brightness is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Reno8 likely holds an edge in image quality due to its more powerful processor and potentially improved image processing algorithms. While specific camera specs are not detailed, the Reno8's chipset allows for better HDR processing and low-light performance. Both phones likely offer similar camera features like portrait mode and night mode.
Performance
The Reno8's Mediatek Dimensity 1300 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage over the Reno7 Z 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G. The Dimensity 1300's Cortex-A78 cores offer significantly higher clock speeds, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance. The Reno7 Z 5G is capable for everyday tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Reno8's 80W charging is a game-changer, allowing for a 50% charge in just 11 minutes and a full charge in 28 minutes. The Reno7 Z 5G's 33W charging is considerably slower. While both phones boast impressive endurance ratings (105h), the Reno8's faster charging means less time tethered to a wall outlet.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo Reno7 Z 5G? It's ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize a stylish design and decent 5G connectivity. Who should buy the Oppo Reno8? It's perfect for those seeking a smoother performance, faster charging, and a brighter, more vibrant display, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno8 worth the extra money compared to the Reno7 Z 5G?
Yes, if you prioritize performance, fast charging, and a brighter display. The Reno8 offers a significantly better user experience overall.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones have an impressive endurance rating of 105 hours, suggesting similar battery life under typical usage. However, the Reno8's faster charging makes it more convenient.
