Oppo Reno7 Z 5G vs Oppo Reno7 5G: The Ultimate Showdown

Choosing between two similar phones can be tough. The Oppo Reno7 Z 5G and Reno7 5G both offer stylish designs and 5G connectivity, but they cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which one is right for you.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Oppo Reno7 5G takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging (65W vs 33W), more powerful Dimensity 900 chipset, and potentially better display brightness. However, the Reno7 Z 5G might be a more budget-friendly option for those prioritizing affordability.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo Reno7 Z 5G Oppo Reno7 5G
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
5G bands1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2022, March 022022, February 04
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, March 21Available. Released 2022, February 17
Body
Dimensions159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in)160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight173 g (6.10 oz)173 g (6.10 oz)
 IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress)-
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)
Size6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio)6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM)AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm)
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G68 MC4
OSAndroid 12, ColorOS 12Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCmicroSDXC
Internal128GB 8GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 UFS 2.2UFS 2.2
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm
Triple64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro)
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR, panoramaPanorama
Single16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired
TypeLi-Po 4500 mAhLi-Po 4500 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, RainbowStary Black, Startrails Blue
ModelsCPH2343CPH2371
PriceAbout 350 EUR$ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 123h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -29.4 LUFS (Average)
Performance- AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Oppo Reno7 Z 5G

  • More affordable
  • Decent 5G connectivity
  • Reverse wired charging

  • Slower charging (33W)
  • Less powerful chipset
  • Potentially dimmer display

Oppo Reno7 5G

  • Faster charging (65W)
  • More powerful chipset (Dimensity 900)
  • Brighter display (635 nits)
  • Potentially better camera performance

  • More expensive
  • Similar battery life to Reno7 Z 5G

Display Comparison

The Reno7 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 635 nits, suggesting a significantly brighter display than the Reno7 Z 5G. While the Reno7 Z 5G's display is likely adequate, the Reno7 5G offers better outdoor visibility. The Reno7 5G also advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, implying excellent image quality, though this is a nominal value.

Camera Comparison

Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. The Reno7 5G likely offers slightly better image processing and low-light performance due to its more powerful chipset. Both phones are expected to deliver good quality photos and videos in well-lit conditions.

Performance

The Reno7 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset is noticeably more powerful than the Reno7 Z 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Reno7 5G. The Dimensity 900's Cortex-A78 cores provide a significant performance boost over the Snapdragon's Kryo 660 cores.

Battery Life

Both phones share an endurance rating of 123h, suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the Reno7 5G's 65W charging is a game-changer, allowing it to charge from 0% to 100% in just 31 minutes, compared to the Reno7 Z 5G's 63 minutes at 33W.

Buying Guide

The Oppo Reno7 Z 5G is ideal for users on a tighter budget who still want 5G connectivity and a decent camera. The Oppo Reno7 5G is for those who prioritize performance, faster charging, and a potentially brighter display, and are willing to spend a bit more.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Oppo Reno7 Z 5G good for gaming?
While it can handle casual games, the Reno7 Z 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset isn't ideal for demanding games. The Reno7 5G offers a better gaming experience.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones have a similar endurance rating (123h), suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage.