Choosing between two Oppo phones can be tough! The Reno7 Z 5G and the A96 both offer attractive features, but cater to slightly different users. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which one best fits your budget and priorities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno7 Z 5G takes the lead thanks to its 5G connectivity and slightly more powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset. While the A96 boasts impressive charging speeds, the Reno7 Z 5G's overall performance and future-proofing make it the better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 34, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 02 | 2022, March 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 21 | Available. Released 2022, March 16 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| | IPX4, dust and water resistant
RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 26 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Rainbow | Starry Black, Sunset Blue |
| Models | CPH2343 | CPH2333 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 560 EUR |
Oppo Reno7 Z 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- Faster Processor (Snapdragon 695)
- Slightly Better Camera
- Modern Design
- Slightly Slower Charging
- Potentially Higher Price
Oppo A96
- Faster Charging Speed
- More Affordable
- Reliable 4G Performance
- Good Value for Money
- No 5G
- Slower Processor (Snapdragon 680)
- Less Impressive Camera
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.43-inch FHD+ AMOLED display with a 60Hz refresh rate. While the quality is similar, the Reno7 Z 5G might offer slightly better color accuracy due to its slightly more advanced processing capabilities. The A96's display is perfectly adequate for everyday use.
Camera Comparison
The Reno7 Z 5G typically features a 64MP main camera, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 2MP macro lens. The A96 has a 50MP main camera, a 2MP macro, and a 2MP depth sensor. While megapixels aren't everything, the Reno7 Z 5G's image processing and slightly larger sensor often result in better overall image quality, especially in low light. Both offer decent selfie cameras.
Performance
The Reno7 Z 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the A96's Snapdragon 680 4G. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Reno7 Z 5G. The A96 is still capable for everyday tasks, but may struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones have a 4500mAh battery. The A96 charges slightly faster (50% in 26 minutes) than the Reno7 Z 5G (31% in 15 minutes) despite both supporting 33W charging. However, the Reno7 Z 5G's more efficient chipset may result in slightly better real-world battery life.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 Z 5G is ideal for users who want 5G connectivity, a smoother experience for gaming and multitasking, and appreciate a modern design. The Oppo A96 is a great option for those prioritizing fast charging, a reliable 4G experience, and a more budget-friendly price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno7 Z 5G worth the extra money?
If 5G connectivity and a smoother performance are important to you, then yes. The Reno7 Z 5G offers a more future-proof experience.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
While both have the same battery capacity, the Reno7 Z 5G's more efficient chipset may result in slightly better real-world battery life.