Oppo Reno7 Z 5G vs Oppo A78: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno7 Z 5G edges out the A78 thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset and 5G connectivity. While the A78 boasts slightly faster charging, the Reno7 Z 5G's Snapdragon 695 provides a smoother, more future-proof experience for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 Z 5G | Oppo A78 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | IP54 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 02 | 2023, January 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 21 | Available. Released 2023, January 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 163.8 x 75.1 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| IPX4, dust and water resistant RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Panda glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min Reverse wired | 33W wired, PD, 52% in 30 min, 100% in 67 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Rainbow | Glowing Black, Glowing Purple |
| Models | CPH2343 | CPH2483, CPH2495 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 188.99 / $ 102.92 / ₹ 16,290 |
Oppo Reno7 Z 5G
- Slightly faster processor (Snapdragon 695)
- 5G Connectivity
- Potentially better camera performance
- Sleek design
- Slightly slower charging than A78
- May be slightly more expensive
Oppo A78
- Faster charging speed
- Large display
- Generally more affordable
- Slightly less powerful processor (Dimensity 700)
- No 5G connectivity
- Potentially less impressive camera
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.43-inch display, likely with an FHD+ resolution. The Reno7 Z 5G might have slightly better color accuracy due to Oppo's typical display tuning, but both offer a pleasant viewing experience. Expect similar brightness levels and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
The Reno7 Z 5G is expected to have a more versatile camera system, potentially with a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing. While both phones likely feature a similar ultrawide lens, the Reno7 Z 5G's processing might result in better low-light performance and dynamic range. Both likely have a front-facing camera around 32MP.
Performance
The Reno7 Z 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G generally outperforms the A78's Dimensity 700 in benchmarks and real-world usage. The Snapdragon chipset's Adreno GPU also provides a slight edge in graphics performance, making it better suited for gaming. However, both phones handle everyday tasks like browsing and social media with ease.
Battery Life
The Oppo A78 has a slight advantage in charging speed, reaching 100% in 67 minutes compared to the Reno7 Z 5G's 63 minutes. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 5000mAh), so real-world battery life should be comparable, with both phones easily lasting a full day of moderate use.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 Z 5G is ideal for users who prioritize 5G connectivity, a slightly faster processor for gaming and multitasking, and a sleek design. The Oppo A78 is a great choice for budget-conscious buyers who value fast charging and a large display for media consumption.