Both the Motorola Edge 30 Neo and the Oppo Reno7 Z 5G target the competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market, powered by the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset. However, they diverge significantly in charging speed and display capabilities, creating a clear distinction for potential buyers. This comparison dives deep into these differences, and others, to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a brighter display, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo is the superior choice. Its 68W charging significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 Z 5G’s 33W, and the measured 1004 nits brightness provides a better viewing experience in sunlight. While both phones share the same core processor, Motorola’s enhancements make it the winner.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 02 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 21 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 173 g (6.10 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| | IPX4, dust and water resistant
RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) | Splash and dust resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired | 68W wired
5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Rainbow | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | CPH2343 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 380818 (v9)
GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 Z 5G
- Established Reno series brand recognition
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially more software features (Oppo's ColorOS)
- Slower 33W charging
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Limited camera specification details
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Significantly faster 68W charging
- Brighter 1004 nit display
- Modern and sleek design
- Less established brand in some markets
- Slower 5W wireless charging
- Limited camera specification details
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1004 nits. This is a substantial advantage over the Oppo Reno7 Z 5G, which lacks published brightness data but is expected to be lower. While both likely utilize OLED panels for vibrant colors, the Edge 30 Neo’s higher brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. The Edge 30 Neo also features an 'infinite' contrast ratio, typical of OLED technology, providing deep blacks and vivid colors. Bezels are comparable, but the Edge 30 Neo’s overall display experience is superior due to its brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume both phones will feature a multi-camera setup, potentially including a main sensor, ultrawide, and macro lens. Given the market segment, image processing will likely prioritize social media-friendly results over absolute accuracy. The absence of detail suggests neither phone is a standout performer in the camera department.
Performance
Both the Oppo Reno7 Z 5G and the Motorola Edge 30 Neo are equipped with the Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration of 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical between the two devices. However, sustained performance could differ based on thermal management, a metric not provided in the source data. RAM configurations are not specified, but the Snapdragon 695 5G supports LPDDR4X, which is standard for this class of device. The real-world performance difference will be minimal, focusing on software optimization rather than raw hardware power.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo and Oppo Reno7 Z 5G both have an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting similar battery life under typical usage. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Edge 30 Neo supports 68W wired charging and 5W wireless charging, while the Reno7 Z 5G offers 33W wired charging with reverse wired functionality. The 68W charging on the Edge 30 Neo can deliver a full charge in approximately 63 minutes (estimated based on similar implementations), while the Reno7 Z 5G takes longer at 63 minutes for a full charge. This faster charging speed is a significant advantage for the Edge 30 Neo, allowing for quick top-ups throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno7 Z 5G if you prioritize a slightly more established brand reputation within the Reno series and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you value faster charging, a brighter and more visible display, and a more modern aesthetic. The Edge 30 Neo is ideal for users who frequently top up their phones throughout the day or spend significant time outdoors.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 5G in either phone struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 5G is a capable mid-range chipset, but it's not designed for high-end gaming. While it can run Genshin Impact, you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. Both phones will offer a similar gaming experience, limited by the chipset's capabilities.
❓ Is the 5W wireless charging on the Motorola Edge 30 Neo practical for daily use?
5W wireless charging is relatively slow compared to wired charging. It's best suited for overnight charging or occasional top-ups. It's a convenient feature, but don't expect it to rapidly replenish the battery. The Reno7 Z 5G lacks wireless charging altogether.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Oppo's ColorOS and Motorola's My UX?
Oppo's ColorOS is known for its extensive customization options and feature set, sometimes bordering on bloatware. Motorola's My UX aims for a cleaner, near-stock Android experience with minimal pre-installed apps. Preference here is subjective; ColorOS offers more features, while My UX prioritizes simplicity.
