Oppo Reno7 SE 5G vs Xiaomi 12 Lite: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 12 Lite emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset offers a slight performance edge, coupled with significantly faster 67W charging. While the Reno7 SE provides a solid experience, the 12 Lite’s charging speed and brighter display justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 SE 5G | Xiaomi 12 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2022, July 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 17 | Available. Released 2022, July 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 159.3 x 73.7 x 7.3 mm (6.27 x 2.90 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 50% in 13 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | Black, Lite Green, Lite Pink |
| Models | PFCM00 | 2203129G |
| Price | About 310 EUR | € 119.80 / $ 269.00 / £ 121.15 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 528905 (v9) GeekBench: 2943 (v5.1) GFXBench: 29fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 SE 5G
- Balanced feature set
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- 5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Slower 33W charging
- Potentially lower peak display brightness
Xiaomi 12 Lite
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC4
- Brighter 824 nit display
- Slightly more powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Potentially higher price
- May not offer reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 12 Lite boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 824 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Reno7 SE. This makes the 12 Lite significantly more usable in direct sunlight. Both feature infinite (nominal) contrast ratios, typical of OLED panels. While both likely employ AMOLED technology, the 12 Lite’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor users and media consumption. Bezels are likely comparable, given both phones target a similar aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. The Xiaomi 12 Lite likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), known for its strong image processing. Without specific sensor size data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, Xiaomi’s history suggests a focus on computational photography, potentially leading to more refined image processing. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the primary sensor of the 12 Lite would be a significant advantage, but this is unconfirmed.
Performance
Both devices utilize 6nm process nodes, but the chipsets differ significantly. The Xiaomi 12 Lite’s Snapdragon 778G 5G features a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core, alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. The Oppo Reno7 SE 5G uses the Mediatek Dimensity 900, with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Snapdragon 778G’s more numerous high-performance cores, and generally more efficient architecture, provide a slight edge in sustained performance and gaming. While both support 5G, the Snapdragon typically has a wider modem compatibility.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing charging capabilities. However, the Xiaomi 12 Lite’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC4, is a game-changer. It can reach 50% charge in just 13 minutes, while the Oppo Reno7 SE 5G’s 33W charging is considerably slower. This difference in charging speed significantly impacts the user experience, especially for those who frequently need to top up their battery. The 5W reverse wired charging on the Reno7 SE is a niche feature, useful for charging accessories but not a primary selling point.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Reno7 SE 5G if you prioritize a balanced package and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s ideal for everyday users who value a reliable experience without demanding peak performance. Buy the Xiaomi 12 Lite if you value fast charging, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a slightly more powerful processor for gaming and demanding applications. It’s geared towards users who want a more premium feel and quicker turnaround times.