Oppo Reno7 SE 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: The Ultimate Showdown

Choosing a new smartphone can be overwhelming, especially with so many excellent options available. Today, we're pitting two popular mid-range 5G phones against each other: the Oppo Reno7 SE 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide which one deserves your money.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G edges out the Reno7 SE 5G thanks to its brighter display, longer software support, and generally more polished software experience. However, the Reno7 SE 5G offers faster charging and a slightly more powerful chipset, making it a compelling alternative for budget-conscious users.

PHONES
Phone Names	Oppo Reno7 SE 5G	Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U
5G bands	1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA	2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
	CDMA2000 1xEV-DO	2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V

Launch
Announced	2021, November 25	2022, March 17
Status	Available. Released 2021, December 17	Available. Released 2022, March 24

Body
Build	-	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions	160.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 in)	159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	171 g (6.03 oz)	189 g (6.67 oz)
	-	IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)

Display
Protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density)
Size	6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio)	6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR)	Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)	Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm)	Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
GPU	Mali-G68 MC4	Mali-G68
OS	Android 11, ColorOS 12	Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8

Memory
Card slot	No	microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM	128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
	UFS 2.2	-

Main Camera
Features	LED flash, HDR, panorama	LED flash, panorama, HDR
Quad	-	64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Single	16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm	32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Triple	48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens	-
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS

Selfie camera
Features	Panorama	HDR
Single	16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm	32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video	1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS	4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	No	No
35mm jack	No	No
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes, with stereo speakers

Comms
Bluetooth	5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD	5.1, A2DP, LE
NFC	No	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent)
	-	Virtual proximity sensing

Battery
Charging	33W wired 5W reverse wired	25W wired
Type	Li-Po 4500 mAh	Li-Po 5000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Black, Blue, Gold	Black, White, Blue, Peach
Models	PFCM00	SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL
Price	About 310 EUR	$ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14
SAR	-	0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	-	0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 113h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-26.5 LUFS (Good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Oppo Reno7 SE 5G

Faster Charging (33W)
Slightly More Powerful Chipset
Stylish Design
Competitive Price

Lower Display Brightness
Potentially Shorter Software Support
Camera Not as Consistent

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G

Brighter Display (830 nits)
Excellent Battery Life
Longer Software Support
Reputable Brand

Slower Charging (25W)
Exynos Chipset Performance
Higher Price

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a significant advantage with its 830 nits peak brightness, making it much easier to see outdoors. While both phones feature Super AMOLED displays (A53) and OLED (Reno7 SE) offering vibrant colors and deep blacks, the A53's brightness is a noticeable upgrade. The A53's 'Infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal value, but generally indicates excellent contrast.

Camera Comparison

Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Galaxy A53 5G generally receives praise for its image processing and overall camera quality. While specific camera specs are not detailed, the A53's reputation suggests better low-light performance and more consistent results. The Reno7 SE 5G's camera is still good, but may not match the A53's consistency.

Performance

The Oppo Reno7 SE 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset offers a slight edge in raw processing power compared to the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A53 5G. Both chipsets are capable of handling everyday tasks and moderate gaming, but the Reno7 SE 5G might provide a smoother experience in more demanding scenarios. However, Samsung's software optimization often compensates for hardware differences.

Battery Life

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G shines in this category with an impressive endurance rating of 113 hours. While the Reno7 SE 5G's battery capacity is likely similar, the A53's power efficiency and software optimization contribute to its superior battery life. The Reno7 SE 5G does offer 33W wired charging, which is faster than the A53's 25W, but the A53's overall battery performance is still better.

Buying Guide

The Oppo Reno7 SE 5G is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more powerful processor for gaming or demanding apps, all while staying within a tighter budget. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is a better choice for those who value a vibrant display, longer software updates, and a more established brand reputation.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone has better battery life?

The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G consistently demonstrates superior battery life due to its efficient hardware and software optimization.

❓ Is the Oppo Reno7 SE 5G good for gaming?

Yes, the Reno7 SE 5G's Dimensity 900 chipset can handle most mobile games, but the Galaxy A53 5G might offer a slightly smoother experience in graphically intensive titles.