Oppo's Reno series consistently delivers stylish phones with impressive features. The Reno7 SE 5G and Reno7 Lite are two compelling options, but which one offers the best value? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their key differences to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Reno7 Lite edges out the Reno7 SE 5G thanks to its brighter display, slightly faster charging, and potentially better camera performance. While the Dimensity 900 offers decent performance, the Snapdragon 695 5G and the Reno7 Lite's overall package make it the more appealing choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2022, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 17 | Available. Released 2022, June |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 159.9 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| | - | IPX4, dust and water resistant
RGB ring lights around the cameras (notifications, charging progress) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
5W reverse wired | 33W wired, PD, 31% in 15 min, 100% in 63 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | Cosmic Black, Champagne Silver |
| Models | PFCM00 | CPH2343 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | About 350 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 125h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 315250 (v8), 376819 (v9)
GeekBench: 1996 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 SE 5G
- Slightly more powerful chipset (Dimensity 900)
- Reverse wired charging
- Stylish design
- Less bright display
- Potentially less refined camera
- Charging speed not as fast as Reno7 Lite
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- Brighter display (657 nits)
- Faster charging (31% in 15 min)
- Potentially better camera performance
- Infinite contrast ratio (nominal)
- Slightly less powerful chipset (Snapdragon 695 5G)
- Reverse wired charging
Display Comparison
The Reno7 Lite boasts a significantly brighter display, measured at 657 nits, offering better visibility in sunlight. While the Reno7 SE 5G's display is adequate, it lacks the same level of vibrancy and outdoor usability. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio mentioned for the Reno7 Lite suggests excellent blacks and a more immersive viewing experience, though this is a nominal value.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a key differentiator. While both phones offer capable cameras, the Reno7 Lite is expected to have a slight edge in image quality, particularly in well-lit conditions. Specific camera specs are missing, but the Snapdragon 695 5G often pairs well with optimized camera software. The Reno7 SE 5G's camera is still respectable, but may not match the Reno7 Lite's potential.
Performance
The Reno7 SE 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset generally offers slightly better raw processing power than the Snapdragon 695 5G in the Reno7 Lite. However, in real-world usage, the difference may not be dramatically noticeable for everyday tasks. Both phones handle multitasking and moderate gaming well.
Battery Life
Both phones share a 33W wired charging capability, but the Reno7 Lite's 31% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 63 minutes indicates slightly faster charging speeds. Both devices boast an impressive endurance rating of 125 hours, suggesting excellent battery life for typical usage.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 SE 5G is a good choice for users prioritizing a slightly more powerful chipset for gaming and demanding tasks, and who are comfortable with a less vibrant display. The Oppo Reno7 Lite is ideal for those who value a brighter, more visually appealing screen, faster charging, and a potentially more refined camera experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo Reno7 SE 5G good for gaming?
The Reno7 SE 5G's Dimensity 900 chipset can handle most games, but demanding titles may require lower graphics settings. The Reno7 Lite is still capable, but may struggle slightly more with high-end games.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones have an endurance rating of 125 hours, suggesting comparable battery life for typical usage. Actual battery performance will vary depending on usage patterns.
