Oppo Reno7 SE 5G vs Oppo Reno7 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Reno7 5G takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster 65W charging, brighter display, and potentially better camera capabilities. While the Reno7 SE 5G offers good value, the Reno7 5G's premium features justify its higher price for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Reno7 SE 5G | Oppo Reno7 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 17 | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 160.2 x 73.2 x 7.5 mm (6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HDR) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Gold | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | PFCM00 | CPH2371 |
| Price | About 310 EUR | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -29.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9) GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1) GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Reno7 SE 5G
- Good value for money
- Sleek design
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Reverse wired charging
- Slower charging speed
- Potentially less impressive camera
- Lower display brightness
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Faster 65W charging
- Brighter display
- Potentially better camera
- Premium feel
- Higher price
- Similar performance to Reno7 SE 5G (CPU/Chipset)
Display Comparison
The Reno7 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 635 nits, significantly brighter than the Reno7 SE 5G, offering better visibility in sunlight. The Reno7 5G also advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting deeper blacks and more vibrant colors, though this is a nominal value. Both phones likely feature similar OLED panels, but the Reno7 5G's brightness advantage is noticeable.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are marketed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Reno7 5G likely features a more advanced camera system with potentially larger sensors and improved image processing algorithms. Expect better low-light performance and more detailed photos from the Reno7 5G. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are missing, making a definitive comparison difficult, but the Reno7 5G is generally expected to have a better camera.
Performance
Both devices share the same Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset and CPU configuration, meaning performance in everyday tasks and gaming should be very similar. However, the Reno7 5G might have slightly better thermal management due to potentially improved cooling solutions, preventing throttling during extended gaming sessions. Real-world performance differences are likely to be minimal.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 123h, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Reno7 5G's 65W charging is a game-changer, allowing for a full charge in just 31 minutes, compared to the Reno7 SE 5G's 33W charging. This difference in charging speed is a significant advantage for the Reno7 5G.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Reno7 SE 5G is ideal for budget-conscious buyers who prioritize a sleek design and reliable performance for everyday tasks. The Oppo Reno7 5G is a better choice for those who demand faster charging, a brighter display for outdoor use, and potentially superior camera quality, and are willing to pay a premium.